EXCLUSIVE: Swiss tax ruled unconstitutional but not removed from law

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EXCLUSIVE: Swiss tax ruled unconstitutional but not removed from law

A capital gains tax law in Switzerland was ruled as unconstitutional, by the Zurich Administrative Court, but the court decided to revert to the cantonal legislator to change the law, meaning the tax still applies.

A large multinational reinsurance group, resident in Zurich, sold several pieces of real estate in Zurich in 2006, generating a substantial capital gain. The Zurich cantonal tax authorities refused to allow the deduction of operational losses from the real estate capital gain.

In Switzerland capital gains realised on private property is tax exempt but an exception applies to real estate. Capital gains tax on real estate is taxed at a cantonal (regional) level.

The capital gains on the sale of business properties are either taxed together with other business profits, with the general corporate income tax, or with the special real estate capital gains (RECG) tax imposed on private real estate capital gains, depending on the canton.

When RECGs are part of a corporate income tax basis, losses from business operations automatically offset the capital gains realised from the sale of property.

Up until 2006, Zurich, and certain other cantons, imposed a special RECG tax and was able to tax capital gains from the sale of real estate regardless of operational losses.

In 2006 a federal court ruled that in inter-cantonal situations it was unconstitutional that a canton, where a RECG materialised, could impose a special RECG tax without accounting for operational losses from other cantons.

The relevant cantons had to allow for the deduction of operational costs from the RECG tax basis when the taxpayer was resident outside the canton in question.

The Zurich canton still refused to deduct operational losses from the RECG basis.

Last month, after a number of proceedings, the Zurich Administrative Court, ruled the capital gains tax law was unconstitutional because it did not accept operational losses deducted from the basis of RECG tax.

The ruling was not immediately effective though and the onus was placed on the cantonal legislator to change the law in a way that was constitutional.

"In Swiss legal practice, it is very uncommon to allow a provision that is found to be unconstitutional to continue to be applied," said Stefan Widmer, of Prime Tax in Zurich, who acted on behalf of the multinational. "There must be an overriding public interest in keeping an unconstitutional law in place."

Widmer's team intends to file a protest, on behalf of the client, with the highest court in Switzerland, the Federal Supreme Court, this week demanding the provision, disallowing operational losses to be deducted and for it to be removed immediately. If the provision is removed then the capital gains tax basis could be reduced by operational losses for all similar disputes.

The decision of the case is expected to set a precedent for other cantons experiencing the same difficulties and is eagerly awaited.

"This case is a milestone in Swiss tax history and would virtually do away with special capital gains tax on business property. The decision in this case is also important for many companies in the Swiss business community as similar cases have been put on hold, awaiting the ruling in this leading case," said Widmer.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Public country-by-country reporting is exposing multinational tax data to investors, journalists and competitors, creating fresh risks for businesses
Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Gift this article