All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Argentine Supreme Court deems tax on presumed minimum income unconstitutional

The Argentine Supreme Court of Justice ruled in Hermitage v Ministry of Economy that Law no. 25,063, which establishes a tax on presumed minimum income (TPMI), or impuesto a la ganancia minima presunta, is unconstitutional.

The Argentine Supreme Court of Justice ruled in Hermitage v Ministry of Economy that Law no. 25,063, which establishes a tax on presumed minimum income (TPMI), or impuesto a la ganancia minima presunta, is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court declared TPMI unconstitutional in Hermitage because the five-star hotel in Mar del Plata successfully proved they could not produce income and subsequently, was unable to pay the TPMI.

TPMI, enacted on December 7 1998, established that Argentine companies, branches, trusts, partnerships and other select entities are subject to a 1% tax at the end of each fiscal year. This 1% tax applies to the company's or entity's worldwide assets, the total assessed tax value of which must be more than $50,700. TPMI will only be owed if the income tax for any fiscal year does not meet or is not more than the amount due under the TPMI. If this is the case, the only difference between the TPMI and the income tax determined for the same fiscal year should be paid. Though this is the default position, exemptions and exceptions exist.

Paid TPMI can be used as credit toward income tax owed for the following 10 years. Financial analysis made by an in-house accountant appointed by Hermitage and the Supreme Court, for reasonsnot addressed in the ruling, only took into account the previous four years. The analysis in Hermitage's case established that the company accumulated a significant amount of loss carry forward during the four-year span. Moreover, the accountant and the Supreme Court agreed that Hermitage did not have the ability to pay the TPMI.

Tomás Balzano, of Estudio Beccar Varela, a law firm in Buenos Aires, explained "the tax is imposed whenever a company has a loss and as such does not have to pay income tax in a given fiscal period, or at least income tax paid does not equal the TPMI – 1% over the worldwide assets . However, it could be construed from the Hermitage case that if a company proves the business isn't going to generate the presumed income established by Law 25,063, the TPMI should not apply. The company effectively lost more than it gained."

In Hermitage, the Supreme Court looked at fiscal years for 1995 through 1998. Hermitage proved that during 1995, 1996 and 1999 the company generated tax losses and did not pay income tax. The Argentine hotel successfully escaped paying TPMI. "This is almost a punishment for non-productivity of assets in Argentina," said Balzano. Having proventhe existence of large losses carry forward, Hermitage now questions if TPMI is truly a tax on assets.

Despite the opinion, which tax professionals did not predict, similar cases in lower level courts in the past have resulted in unfavourable decisions for taxpayers. For example, Lindberg Argentina SA in September 2001 and Georgalos vs. Ministry of Economy in February 2001 ended in adverse decisions for corporate taxpayers because of insufficient proof of tax loss.

The ruling in Hermitage, while innovative, is limited to the facts in the case. "Lower level courts are not obliged to follow precedent," said Ezequiel Lipovetzky of Bruchou, Fernández Madero & Lombardi - Taxand.

Hermitage "cannot be used in principle in all cases," said Balzano.

One practitioner believes that this will not deter companies from pursuing this and other related issues in court .

"In the near future we are going to have many discussions related to this case law. Before the year ends, taxpayers will somehow start some actions in order to protect their rights," said Andrés Edelstein of PricewaterhouseCoopers.

More from across our site

The Indian Union Budget made some significant changes that will affect taxpayers, as Ranjeet Mahtani, Saurabh Shah, and Meetika Baghel of Dhruva Advisors explain.
But experts cast doubt on HMRC's data and believe COVID-19 would have increased the revenue shortfall.
EY’s plan to separate its auditing and consulting businesses might lessen scrutiny from global regulators, but the brand identity could suffer, say sources.
Multinationals are asking world leaders to put a scale on carbon pricing to tackle climate change at the 48th G7 summit in Germany, from June 26 to 28.
The state secretary told the French press that the country continues to oppose pillar two’s global minimum tax rate following an Ecofin meeting last week.
This week the Biden administration has run into opposition over a proposal for a federal gas tax holiday, while the European Parliament has approved a plan for an EU carbon border mechanism.
12th annual awards announce winners
Businesses need to improve on data management to ensure tax departments become much more integrated, according to Microsoft’s chief digital officer at a KPMG event.
Businesses must ensure any alternative benchmark rate is included in their TP studies and approved by tax authorities, as Libor for the US ends in exactly a year.
Tax directors warn that a lack of adequate planning for VAT rule changes could leave businesses exposed to regulatory errors and costly fines.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree