International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Chilean tax reform – Where are we now? Proposed changes in light of international businesses and Chile’s tax treaties

valenzuela.jpg

benedetto.jpg

Mauricio Valenzuela


Sandra Benedetto

On April 1 2014, Chile's executive branch sent a tax reform Bill to the Chilean Congress, with the aim of increasing tax revenues to finance public education. The Bill contained substantial amendments to the Chilean tax system resulting in the most significant tax debate in Chile for the past 30 years. Within the context of international businesses, the following suggested amendments brought the attention of both local and foreign practitioners: (i) gradual increase of the corporate tax rate from 20% to 25% over a four-year period; (ii) change in the basis of taxation for foreign shareholders from a cash to an attribution basis – 35% withholding tax regardless of whether effective distributions are made with a credit for the underlying 25% corporate tax paid; (iii) harmonisation of capital gains taxation in hands of foreign shareholders at a 35% rate; (iv) non-deductibility of interest expenses related to the acquisition of shares or quotas; and, (v) the introduction of a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) regime.

Even though the tax reform was approved by the House of Representatives, the discussion on the constitutionality of some proposed provisions and potential adverse tax consequences for both local and foreign investments derived into a 'protocol of agreement' signed on July 8 2014, between the executive branch and the Chilean Senate's Finance Commission including representatives of different political parties, where guidelines and areas to be amended were agreed.

The most significant change proposed by such protocol, which was a political agreement with no binding effect, was to keep the attributed mechanism as one taxing alternative and to maintain the existing integrated income tax system (where taxation at a 35% rate is applied on dividend distributions on a cash basis with the right to recognise a credit for the tax already paid at the corporate level) but with two relevant modifications: (i) the increase of the corporate tax rate from the current 20% to 27%; and (ii) to recognise only 65% of the corporate tax as a credit against the final 35% withholding tax.

This alternative mechanism, as proposed, could have adverse implications from a Chilean tax treaty perspective.

Indeed, the Chilean integrated tax system motivated Chile to negotiate for a specific clause in all of its tax treaties under which no treaty relief is granted for dividends distributed from Chile to abroad to the extent the corporate tax is fully creditable against 35% withholding tax or the effective tax rate exceeds 42% (wording may vary from treaty to treaty). If that is the case, the relevant authorities may be required to renegotiate to balance the allocation of taxing rights.

In addition, depending on the mechanics of computation, this alternative system could lead into an effective rate exceeding the mentioned 42% threshold.

The discussion on this was installed and was expected to be rectified in the new package of amendments to the tax reform Bill which was finally released on August 9 2014; where this and other important adjustments to the tax Bill were made.

In fact, the discussion on Chile's tax treaty policy fructified and the new amendments released included a full credit mechanism in the case of treaty residents. Therefore, if the law is enacted as proposed, taxation on dividends for treaty jurisdictions would become a real benefit compared with the 35% withholding tax with partial credit that would remain for non-treaty jurisdictions, resulting in an effective rate of 44.45%.

Besides the above, the harmonisation of the capital gains tax rate at 35% for foreign shareholders (now 35% or 20%) calls for a revision of the existing tax treaties Chile has in force, as in some cases a 16% maximum rate is established for substantial ownership.

Finally, it is worth mentioning that, as agreed in the protocol, the new amendments released repealed the limitation on interest deductibility. Also, CFC rules were maintained with some amendments from which we could highlight broader rules for foreign tax credit in case of treaty jurisdictions or where there is an exchange of information agreement in force with Chile. In addition the threshold for being deemed a preferential tax regime for CFC purposes was raised.

The amendments released on August 9 2014 represented a milestone in the process of approving the tax reform Bill. We will continue monitoring how discussions evolve in the Senate along with the real impact the new regulations may have for foreign investors and, in particular, for the application of Chile's tax treaties.

Mauricio Valenzuela (mauricio.valenzuela@us.pwc.com)

Tel: +1 646 471 7323
Sandra Benedetto (sandra.benedetto@cl.pwc.com)

Tel: +562 29400155

PwC

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

PwC publishes detailed accounts of its behaviour in the tax scandal in Australia, while another tax trial looms for pop star Shakira.
The winners of the ITR Europe, Middle East, and Africa Tax Awards 2023 have been announced!
The winners of the ITR Asia-Pacific Tax Awards 2023 have been announced!
Mauro Faggion appeared cautiously optimistic as the European Commission waits to see whether all 27 member states will accept its proposal.
The global minimum rate also won’t entirely stop a race to the bottom, according to a tax director speaking at an ITR conference in London.
The country’s tax authorities are not interested in seeing transfer pricing studies any more, it was claimed at an ITR industry conference in London.
The controversial measure is being watered down after criticism from the European Central Bank.
More than 600 such requests were made in 2022, while HMRC has also bolstered its fraud service, it has been revealed.
The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.