Australia: Tax consolidation rules: Potential risk areas

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Tax consolidation rules: Potential risk areas

seymour.jpg

Tom Seymour

The tax consolidation rules should remain high on any Australian group's assessment of potential tax risks, particularly as we see the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) focus on reviewing prior year claims, and we still have a number of retrospective unenacted tax consolidation changes. In recent times the ATO has been very active in issuing detailed questionnaires to tax consolidated groups which it believes may have made claims affected by the provisions enacted in 2012 to retrospectively unwind the rights to future income (RTFI) and residual tax cost setting rules. Some of the issues the ATO is focussing on include:

  • Deductions claimed for non-contractual intangibles such as customer relationships;

  • Utilising a cost base, for capital gains tax (CGT) purposes, for the reset tax cost of non-deductible RTFI assets such as customer contracts (under the pre-rules);

  • RTFI deductions incorrectly claimed for any value attributable to a period beyond the time the relevant contract could be unilaterally cancelled by the customer; and

  • Any RTFI deduction claimed under the interim rules that contributed to a tax loss.

Groups are yet to see the legislative detail for the consolidation-related measures announced in the 2013-14 Federal Budget, which the new government confirmed on November 6 2013 will go ahead. This includes the following which are proposed to apply to transactions that take place after 7.30pm AEST on May 14 2013:

  • Future deductible liabilities (for example employee leave entitlements) of a joining entity will result in the head company of the joined group including a corresponding amount in its assessable income;

  • Non-residents will not be able to buy and sell membership interests between consolidated groups to allow the same ultimate owner to claim double deductions through the resetting of the tax cost of the assets of the relevant joining entity in cases where there has been no recognition of any gain on the transfer of the membership interests; and

  • Intra-group assets will no longer be recognised for purposes of applying principal asset test in working out whether an indirect Australian real property interest held by a foreign resident is subject to CGT.

Given the element of retrospectivity and lack of detail for these measures, it is hoped that they will receive top priority in terms of public consultation in coming months.

Those multinationals operating in Australia through a multiple entry consolidated (MEC) group will also need to keenly watch the outcome of last year's commissioned tripartite review, chaired by Treasury and involving the ATO and the private sector, to examine and implement policies to ensure that MEC groups and Australian consolidated groups compete on a level playing field. Any changes resulting from that review are intended to apply from July 1 2014, although we expect the government has reserved the right to take earlier legislative action if it becomes aware of aggressive tax minimisation practices over the course of its review.

We also expect to see a broader review of consolidation issues to be undertaken by the Australian Treasury in 2015.

Tom Seymour (tom.seymour@au.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +61 (7) 3257 8623

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article