Greece: GAAR introduced for the first time in Greek tax law

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: GAAR introduced for the first time in Greek tax law

stathis.jpg

Dionisios Stathis

On July 26 2013, new Greek Tax Procedure Code (l. 4174/2013) was enacted by the Greek Parliament, which introduced for the first time the concept of general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR). In particular, according to the newly established rule, effective as of January 1 2014, the tax administration has the right to ignore any artificial arrangement or series of artificial arrangements giving rise to tax avoidance or tax benefits in general. The new rule provides for a definition, scope and brief description of the terms "arrangement", "series of arrangements" and "artificial". As regards scope, it applies to cases where the legal treatment of a sole arrangement differs from the legal treatment of a series of arrangements taken together, where no sound business reasons exist for the effecting of the arrangement (or series of arrangements), where the various arrangements taken as a whole contradict to and cancel each other and where the tax benefit(s) obtained do not reflect the business risks undertaken by the contracting parties. It is interesting to note that, contrary to other jurisdictions, Greece did not have so far any legal tradition in respect of substance over form or similar principles or doctrines emanating either from case law or from legal practice in general. Perhaps the only relevant concept in Greek legal theory was that of sham or fictitious transactions found predominantly in Greek civil law. Traditionally the Greek tax administration used to apply in the course of both domestic and treaty law the opposite general principle of form over substance which was based on the widely accepted notion that the tax rules must be interpreted narrowly by the tax administration.

From a practical perspective, the introduction of an explicit GAAR in domestic tax law may have significant impact in contemplated transactions and/or tax planning structures. For example, even though Greece has not introduced so far anti-treaty shopping rules either domestically or in the double tax treaties (DTTs) concluded with other states, it could be argued that, based on the domestic GAAR, treaty benefits may be limited and/or denied even to treaty residents under certain circumstances and especially where it may be evidenced that the interposition of an entity in a treaty country was effected solely to obtain treaty benefits.

Similarly, from an indirect tax perspective, instances of stamp duty mitigation in loan transactions on the basis of the territoriality principle may now be challenged on the grounds that the conclusion and/or execution of a loan overseas may still be subject to Greek stamp duty charges if it may be extracted that the overseas conclusion and execution was not substantiated by any business reasons but was encouraged merely to enjoy the stamp duty exemption.

Another practical example where the introduction of a GAAR may have serious consequences is the equity injection in a Greek corporation through share premium (instead of nominal share capital) with a view to qualifying for capital duty exemption. It may now be argued that such a technique, which is popular in Greek tax practice, may be challenged in the course of a future tax audit if a mere comparison is attempted between the same transaction with and without the tax avoidance element (that is share capital increase through share premium and through nominal share capital respectively).

No ministerial decisions, circulars and/or other official guidelines have been issued thus far to complement the aforementioned GAAR's interpretation and, consequently, there is great uncertainty at the moment regarding the exact scope and object of that rule. It is expected that the Greek tax administration will supplement this GAAR with additional safe-harbour tests so that it will be able for the taxpayers to overtly distinguish between what is allowed and what is prohibited under Greek tax law, especially before they proceed to inbound and outbound tax planning structures.

Dionisios Stathis (dionisios.stathis@gr.ey.com)

EY

Tel: +30 210 2886573

Fax: +30 210 2886908

Website: www.ey.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article