International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: SAT’s formal assessment on service fees and royalty payments

ho.jpg

lu.jpg

Khoonming Ho


Lewis Lu

In an area of immediate importance to taxpayers, the State Administration of Taxation (SAT) recently instructed tax bureaus across the country to survey and report back in September regarding companies in their jurisdictions which have made service fee or royalty payments to related parties between the years 2004 and 2013; these years are eligible for potential tax adjustments since the statute of limitations for transfer pricing audits is 10 years. In addition, the SAT urged tax bureaus to formally begin registering transfer pricing audits now of companies which engaged in such transactions deemed to be especially suspicious. In terms of focus, the SAT is paying particular attention to a number of specific issues, for example royalty payments made to:

  • entities in "tax haven" jurisdictions; and

  • overseas related parties with few or no functions, and which are therefore perceived to have little economic substance.

Also, cases where the Chinese taxpayer may have made significant contributions to the value of the intangibles, or where the intangibles may have eroded in value since initially being licensed, are receiving close scrutiny.

With regard to services, the SAT is focusing attention to those which:

  • relate to shareholder activities;

  • relate to supervision by the group headquarters;

  • may be duplicative to ones that the Chinese service recipient can or is also performing in-house or are already provided by third parties;

  • may be irrelevant to the Chinese service recipient given its functional and risk profile or business operations; or

  • for which the remuneration is already reflected in other transactions.

Against this background, the issuance of internal directives to actively scrutinise related party service and royalty payments from the SAT's perspective is likely a logical step to take. As a result, it is expected that a significant number of transfer pricing audits with focus on royalties and service fees will be conducted across the country.

For taxpayers, this is an area of immediate concern and action to manage the tax risks arising from service fee and royalty payments. It is recommended that companies review relevant documentation to ensure adequate evidence is in place and assess areas of potential controversy.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.
With marked economic disruption matched by a frenetic rate of regulatory upheaval, ITR partnered with Asia’s leading legal minds to navigate the continent’s growing complexity.
Lawmakers seem more reticent than ever to make ambitious tax proposals since the disastrous ‘mini-budget’ last September, but the country needs serious change.
The panel, the only one dedicated to tax at the World Economic Forum, comprised government ministers and other officials.
Colombian Finance Minister José Antonio Ocampo announced preparations for a Latin American tax summit, while the potentially ‘dangerous’ Inflation Reduction Act has come under fire.
The OECD’s two-pillar solution may increase global tax revenue gains by more than $200 billion a year, but pillar one is the key to such gains due to its fundamental changes to taxing rights.
The solution to address the tax challenges arising from digitalisation and globalisation will generate more revenue than previously estimated.