International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Recent treaty shopping developments

In part, as a consequence of the OECD's work on BEPS and its specific efforts to address treaty shopping, the Canadian government has been considering a range of possible measures that might be adopted to counteract treaty shopping.

jamal.jpg

leopardi.jpg

Soraya Jamal


John Leopardi

Consideration of this issue has been within the context of the government's overriding intention to retain an internationally competitive tax system while, at the same time, addressing perceived limitations in, and abuses of, Canada's international tax system. Following a public consultation in 2013 but before the release by the OECD of the BEPS deliverable on treaty shopping, in its 2014 Canadian federal Budget, the government announced that a domestic rule to prevent treaty shopping, which would apply to all Canadian tax treaties, would be more effective than a treaty-based approach such as the US-style limitation on benefits (LoB) approach. The proposed domestic rule would apply broadly to permit the government to deny a treaty-based benefit if one of the main purposes for undertaking a relevant transaction was to obtain that benefit. However, after engaging in further public consultations, the government announced in August 2014 that it would await further work by the OECD and the G20 in relation to their BEPS initiative before moving ahead with its proposed domestic rule.

On September 16 2014, the OECD released a series of BEPS deliverables, including a report containing draft recommendations relating to preventing the abuse of tax treaties (Action 6 of the OECD plan). The report contains a draft recommendation that tax treaties should include a specific anti-abuse rule (based on the LoB provisions used in US treaties) along with a more general anti-abuse rule (based on the principal purposes of the transactions). The final version of the OECD's recommendations to address treaty shopping is due to be released in September 2015.

The government had initially indicated a clear desire to prevent treaty shopping with the use of a domestic rule. The OECD's September 2014 report confirms that countries should, at the very least, amend their tax treaties to address treaty shopping. It is unclear whether Canada will abandon the more subjective domestic anti-treaty shopping proposals released earlier this year or will adopt an approach that contains a combination of both domestic and objective treaty-based measures or hopefully, only treaty-based measures. Existing cross-border arrangements should be closely monitored given the existing uncertainty, including as to whether transitional relief, if any, will be provided to such arrangements.

Soraya Jamal (soraya.jamal@blakes.com) and John Leopardi (john.leopardi@blakes.com)

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 604 631 3305; +1 514 982 5030

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.
With marked economic disruption matched by a frenetic rate of regulatory upheaval, ITR partnered with Asia’s leading legal minds to navigate the continent’s growing complexity.
Lawmakers seem more reticent than ever to make ambitious tax proposals since the disastrous ‘mini-budget’ last September, but the country needs serious change.
The panel, the only one dedicated to tax at the World Economic Forum, comprised government ministers and other officials.
Colombian Finance Minister José Antonio Ocampo announced preparations for a Latin American tax summit, while the potentially ‘dangerous’ Inflation Reduction Act has come under fire.
The OECD’s two-pillar solution may increase global tax revenue gains by more than $200 billion a year, but pillar one is the key to such gains due to its fundamental changes to taxing rights.
The solution to address the tax challenges arising from digitalisation and globalisation will generate more revenue than previously estimated.