International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: New thin capitalisation rules



Loreto Pelegrí

Rodrigo Winter

On September 29 2014, Law N° 20.780 was published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Chile, amending several tax provisions contained in the current Chilean Income Tax Law, as well as several other tax provisions. Among the changes contained in the law are the new thin capitalisation rules applicable to loans granted from January 1 2015 onwards. Thus, loans granted before January 1 2015 will continue to be subject to the old thin capitalisation rules.

Nevertheless, the Law provides that the new thin capitalisation rules are also applicable to loans granted before 2015 whenever such loans have been amended, in the sense that they have been transferred, the debtor has been changed, the principal or interest amount have been modified, or whenever the liability has been directly or indirectly transferred to a related party.

Please bear in mind that under the old thin capitalisation rules, a sole 31% tax was applicable over the interest related to the excess indebtedness at the Chilean debtor level in cases where three joint requirements are met: i) loan has been granted by a related party; ii) loan would be subject to the reduced 4% withholding tax on interest; and iii) debt-to-equity ratio exceeds 3:1.

Also, under the old thin capitalisation provisions, the excess of indebtedness position was calculated only once, that is, in the year when a related loan was granted, such 31% tax being deductible from the debtor's net taxable income. This 31% tax is independent from the 4% withholding tax on interest paid to the foreign creditor.

Pursuant to the new thin capitalisation rules, not only interest is subject to the thin capitalisation rules, but also commissions or fees, financial expenses, and any other disbursement related to the loan. Also, the excess of indebtedness position must be calculated on a yearly basis and consider all loans (local and offshore loans, both related and unrelated).

Under the new thin capitalisation rules, an 'excess of indebtedness tax' of 35% must be paid by the Chilean debtor, the 4% withholding tax being creditable against such aforementioned tax, which continues to be deductible for the Chilean debtor.

When determining the tax base of this 35% excess of indebtedness tax, and provided that the 3:1 debt-to-equity ratio is exceeded, only interest, commissions, financial expenses, and any other disbursements should be subject to this tax, if and when: i) the loan was granted by a related party, and ii) such disbursements were subject to the 4% withholding tax.

Finally, the concept of 'related party' included in the old rule has been broadened by the new law.

This new thin capitalisation regime will imply a significant challenge for Chilean companies, and also for the Chilean Internal Revenue Service.

Loreto Pelegrí ( and Rodrigo Winter (


Tel: +56 229400155


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF has warned Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.