International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: New miscellaneous rules introduce additional flexibility on the Mexican maquila regime

cuellar.jpg

salagaray.jpg

David Cuellar


Cesar Salagaray

The 2014 tax reform introduced significant changes and restrictions on the Mexican maquila income tax regime, one of which is the requirement that the income from operating activities must derive exclusively from maquila operations. Under the former rules, many multinational entities (MNEs) opted to structure their operations in a way that the maquila entity carried out certain activities that could be considered as auxiliary to the production activity itself, such as the lease of space (real estate) or assets to other group entities, rendering employee services, disposal of scrap or limited distribution of certain goods.

Considering the new rules in force since January 1 2014, many multinationals operating under these type of combined structures could have lost the benefits set forth by article 181 of the Mexican Income Tax Law as a consequence of the income derived from non-maquila auxiliary activities.

However, on July 1 2014, the Mexican tax authorities published a new amendment to the Mexican miscellaneous rules in force for 2014 and among other changes, introduced certain clarifications and changes to the current maquila regime through rule I.3.19.1.

In general terms, the new miscellaneous rules provide additional flexibility allowing Mexican Maquiladora companies to carry out certain "complementary" activities as part of their "productive income" without jeopardising their maquila status. The complementary activities allowed for maquila companies could be summarised as follows:

  • Employee services (lease of personnel);

  • Leasing/sale of movable and real estate property;

  • Disposal of scrap produced by maquila operations;

  • Interest income; and

  • Other income related to the maquila operations, except for sales of finished goods.

These new rules and the permitted complementary activities may avoid the need for certain multinationals that were carrying out combined maquila activities to restructure their operations or even losing the maquila regime, within the rules, the Maquiladora company must comply with the following requirements:

  • The total of this other income should not exceed 10% of the total income from the maquila operations;

  • In the case of personnel leasing, the employees should be provided only to related parties;

  • Additional information filing requirements (consisting basically in providing segmented information regarding the complementary activities);

  • To file a notification in case of the sale of movable and real estate property.

These regulations will become effective on October 1 2014. Meanwhile, Maquiladoras can continue to consider that their total income qualifies as derived from their maquila activity, if and only if they maintain accounting records that allow differentiation between each type of income and associated costs and expenses.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Cesar Salagaray (cesar.salagaray@mx.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Brazilian government may be about to align the country’s unique system with OECD standards, but this is a long-awaited TP reform and success is uncertain.
Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.