International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bulgaria: New appendix to the corporate annual tax return

pechilkova.jpg

Donka Pechilkova

The Bulgarian Ministry of Finance added an important new Appendix (Reference No.1 to Appendix 4) to the annual tax return that legal entities are obliged to submit for the calendar year of 2013. The appendix concerns transactions between related parties (both local and foreign ones) and transactions that were carried out with companies registered in offshore zones. In the application, all companies are obliged to disclose the amounts of such transactions that were settled during the year, as well as the type of the transactions (sales or purchases of goods, services and so on; loans; intercompany remunerations and other types of incomes or expenses). Due to the fact that the above-mentioned changes also concern transactions with physical persons, on March 10 2014 the National Revenue Agency published instructions for the filling out of Reference No.1 to Appendix 4 of the annual tax return declaration according to the text and meaning of Article 92 of the Corporate Income Tax Act and Reference No.7 to Appendix 4 of the annual tax return, related to Article 50 of the Income Taxes on Natural Persons Act. The aforementioned guidelines also attempt to clarify the ambiguity of the phrase "persons that have carried out transactions" included in Reference No. 1, which in some cases is replaced with "settled transactions", creating an obvious inconsistency in the method of reporting of loans and other transactions.

The guidelines also indicate the exceptions when it is not necessary to provide information for Reference No. 1, such as dividends and liquidation proceeds, personal performing of work by partners or owners in non-labour relationships in the company, with duly provided tax and insurance information. One must not forget that in cases of failure to file an appendix to the annual tax return or if false or incorrect data is provided, the penalty to be imposed ranges between 100 to 1,000 lev ($70 to $700) (Article 262 of the Corporate Income Tax Act). In this regard, it is stated that considering the fact that Appendix No 4 is a new requirement and not well-known to taxpayers, one should be cautious about the presence of any errors.

This new requirement is another step made by the tax administration towards the building of a harmonised tax system in the country, and one which will also cover the requirements of the EU legislation and meet the needs for a unified international tax control.

Donka Pechilkova (donka.pechilkova@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Sofia Office

Tel: +359 2 988 69 78

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.