Bulgaria: New appendix to the corporate annual tax return
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bulgaria: New appendix to the corporate annual tax return

pechilkova.jpg

Donka Pechilkova

The Bulgarian Ministry of Finance added an important new Appendix (Reference No.1 to Appendix 4) to the annual tax return that legal entities are obliged to submit for the calendar year of 2013. The appendix concerns transactions between related parties (both local and foreign ones) and transactions that were carried out with companies registered in offshore zones. In the application, all companies are obliged to disclose the amounts of such transactions that were settled during the year, as well as the type of the transactions (sales or purchases of goods, services and so on; loans; intercompany remunerations and other types of incomes or expenses). Due to the fact that the above-mentioned changes also concern transactions with physical persons, on March 10 2014 the National Revenue Agency published instructions for the filling out of Reference No.1 to Appendix 4 of the annual tax return declaration according to the text and meaning of Article 92 of the Corporate Income Tax Act and Reference No.7 to Appendix 4 of the annual tax return, related to Article 50 of the Income Taxes on Natural Persons Act. The aforementioned guidelines also attempt to clarify the ambiguity of the phrase "persons that have carried out transactions" included in Reference No. 1, which in some cases is replaced with "settled transactions", creating an obvious inconsistency in the method of reporting of loans and other transactions.

The guidelines also indicate the exceptions when it is not necessary to provide information for Reference No. 1, such as dividends and liquidation proceeds, personal performing of work by partners or owners in non-labour relationships in the company, with duly provided tax and insurance information. One must not forget that in cases of failure to file an appendix to the annual tax return or if false or incorrect data is provided, the penalty to be imposed ranges between 100 to 1,000 lev ($70 to $700) (Article 262 of the Corporate Income Tax Act). In this regard, it is stated that considering the fact that Appendix No 4 is a new requirement and not well-known to taxpayers, one should be cautious about the presence of any errors.

This new requirement is another step made by the tax administration towards the building of a harmonised tax system in the country, and one which will also cover the requirements of the EU legislation and meet the needs for a unified international tax control.

Donka Pechilkova (donka.pechilkova@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Sofia Office

Tel: +359 2 988 69 78

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As German clients attempt to comply with complex cross-border rules, local advisers argue that aggressive tax authorities are making life even harder
Based on surveys covering more than 25,000 in-house lawyers, the series provides insights into what law firms must score highly on when pitching to in-house counsel
The UK tax authority reportedly lost a case due to missing a deadline; in other news, Canada has approved pillar two legislation
There will always be multinationals trying to minimise tax by pushing the boundaries of their cross-border arrangements, Rob Heferen claimed
HMRC’s attempts to crack down on fraudulent tax relief claims are well-meaning, but the agency risks penalising genuinely innovative businesses, writes Katy Long of ForrestBrown
Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa are among the countries the OECD believes could benefit from the simplified TP rules
It comes despite an offshore enabler penalty existing in the UK throughout the entire period
It is extraordinary that tax advisers in the UK can offer their services without having to join a professional body. This looks like it is coming to an end, Ralph Cunningham writes
Meet the esteemed judges who are assessing the first-ever Social Impact Awards
The ‘big four’ firm has also vowed to spend more on nurturing junior talent; in other news, Blick Rothenberg has hired a pair of tax partners
Gift this article