Australia: Draft guidance on new Australian transfer pricing rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Draft guidance on new Australian transfer pricing rules

seymour.jpg

Tom Seymour

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has released draft guidance on the new Australian transfer pricing rules. The draft guidance addresses the topics of documentation, penalties, and the 'reconstruction' rules. The new transfer pricing rules include specific provisions that, in certain circumstances, require the taxpayer to disregard in whole, or in part, the actual transactions entered into and replace them with hypothetical transactions. The intention was for the rules to be consistent with the 'exceptional circumstances' under which the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines permit the non-recognition of transactions.

Although the intention may be that the reconstruction provisions should only apply in exceptional cases, the ATO's draft guidance is very broad and will require taxpayers to consider the potential application of these provisions to all dealings they enter into. While this approach may be deliberate so as to encompass a broad range of fact patterns and possibilities, it is far from definitive and is likely to cause undue concern and uncertainty among taxpayers and increase their compliance burden in light of the self-assessment based application of these provisions.

The new transfer pricing rules also introduced documentation requirements as a prerequisite for establishing a reasonably arguable position on a transfer pricing matter. This impacts the penalties that may apply in the event of an adjustment. To meet the new requirements, documentation must be prepared by the time of lodging the Australian income tax return and be in the possession of, or freely accessible to, the Australian taxpayer. The documentation must be consistent with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, while also addressing the particular requirements of the Australian transfer pricing law (such as the reconstruction provisions).

Taxpayers who have prepared documentation in prior years based on the ATO's previous guidance will need to review their approach as some modifications may be required to ensure the new legislative requirements are met.

Interestingly, the ATO's draft guidance suggests certain global business and industry information should be included in the Australian transfer pricing documentation. The OECD's current proposals for transfer pricing documentation would require this information to be compiled in a global master file rather than in local country files. Arguably, the ATO's expectations of the global information that should be included in the local Australian file go beyond what would be required for the OECD master file.

As the new rules operate on a self-assessment basis, all taxpayers must assess whether their related party dealings are arm's-length before lodging the tax return, even if they choose not to prepare formal transfer pricing documentation. Many taxpayers are likely to seek to perform at least a preliminary assessment before year-end to reduce the likelihood of needing to make a post-year end adjustment in the tax return which may give rise to double tax. Taxpayers with a June 30 year-end will be the first required to apply the new rules (to the year ending June 30 2014).

Tom Seymour (tom.seymour@au.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +61 (7) 3257 8623

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article