FYR Macedonia: FYR Macedonia changes tax treatment of uncollected loans

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FYR Macedonia: FYR Macedonia changes tax treatment of uncollected loans

kostovska.jpg

Elena Kostovska

The corporate income tax system in FYR Macedonia – since its groundbreaking revamping in 2011 – has been mostly concerned with the unrecognised (non-deductible) expenses of a company for the purposes of determining its tax base, as opposed to the actual profit of a company. However, within the past three years of the validity of this novel corporate income tax regime, and due to the resulting shrinking of the tax base of companies, the government and tax authorities are finding themselves in a constant loop of amendments aimed at widening the tax base by effectively introducing new categories in the so-called unrecognised expenses list.

Early in 2014, a change in the tax treatment of uncollected loan amounts was introduced. From January 31 2014, outstanding receivables' balances on loans granted from one resident entity to another, which haven't been collected within the same year that they were extended, are to be considered as written off during the year in question and to be thus regarded as unrecognised expenses for the loan-granting entity. Consequently, this results in the increase of the company's corporate income tax base. Thus, all inter-company loans extended after January 31 2014 are now subject to this change, with older loans not impacted by the amendment in any way.

It is worth noting that this change is only applicable to companies which are taxpayers in the sense of the standard corporate income tax regime (with 10% imposed on a tax base consisting of unrecognised expenses plus understated revenues plus any distributed profits) and does not impact companies which, due to their size, have opted to pay corporate income tax on a tax base of total revenue (at the rate of 1% on total revenues). Additionally, the above change impacts all inter-company loans, regardless of whether they are extended between related or unrelated entities.

One should keep in mind that, in addition to increasing the tax base in the year in which the loan receivables were not collected (thus increasing the amount of corporate income tax due), during the year in which loan receivables will in fact be collected, the tax base is to be decreased by the amount of the collection, thus enabling the taxpayer to pay less corporate income tax in the periods when they actually collect the loan amounts.

Elena Kostovska (elena.kostovska@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Skopje Office

Tel: +389 2 2400225

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
Gift this article