China: Fourth protocol to the China – Hong Kong tax treaty

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: Fourth protocol to the China – Hong Kong tax treaty

ho.jpg

lu.jpg

Khoonming Ho


Lewis Lu

On April 1 2015 the governments of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Hong Kong SAR signed the Fourth protocol (the Protocol) to the China – Hong Kong double tax arrangement (DTA) of 2008. The Protocol provides 'best-in-class' tax treaty provisions for Hong Kong enterprises undertaking aircraft and ship leasing from the mainland and those conducting cross-border public market securities investment activities. These treatments would boost Hong Kong's development as a capital equipment leasing hub and as an asset management centre. For royalty withholding tax, lease rentals derived from aircraft and ship leasing businesses (excluding the interest portion under a finance lease arrangement), covered under the DTA's royalties article, are now subject to a reduced rate of withholding tax (WHT) of 5%, down from 7%.

For capital gains, the Protocol also provides clarifications that capital gains derived from shares trading where both the purchase and sale of shares in listed companies on a recognised exchange platform by either Hong Kong or China enterprises, will be exempt from tax in the jurisdiction where listed shares are transacted. Clarifications are also provided to permit an investment fund, established in Hong Kong, to be considered as tax resident in Hong Kong and therefore to be eligible for this listed shares relief in its own right.

And for treaty abuse and exchange of information, as has been the trend for new and updated DTAs of China over the past three years, the Protocol inserts anti-avoidance rules in the dividend, interest, royalties and capital gains articles providing that DTA benefits will not be available if the main purpose for entering into an arrangement was to secure a more favorable tax position. The Protocol also extends the definition of PRC taxes subject to the exchange of information article under the DTA to include VAT, consumption tax, business tax, land appreciation tax and real estate tax.

The Protocol is highly advantageous to Hong Kong and the revised DTA offers significant comparable benefits to Hong Kong enterprises conducting cross-border investments and business activities with the mainland. In addition, it follows China's general DTA update policy and is aligned with China's recent focus on BEPS.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tom Goldstein, who is now a blogger, is being represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson
In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
Gift this article