International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Foreign exchange gains and losses from forward contracts



Carrie Aiken

Dan Jankovic

The Tax Court of Canada in George Weston Limited v R (2015 TCC 42) recently held that an early termination of a currency swap entered into by a Canadian public corporation (GWL) with substantial (indirect) US operations to hedge foreign currency fluctuations and their impact on its consolidated financial statements resulted in a capital gain. The decision rejects outright the Canada Revenue Agency's administrative position that a derivative transaction is on capital account only if the transaction is a hedge that is sufficiently linked to an underlying transaction on capital account (for example, a sale of an asset or repayment of debt) and not an asset or liability and further, that the hedge must be undertaken by the entity that directly owns the item being hedged. GWL entered into the swaps shortly after a large acquisition of a US business by one of its subsidiaries. The scale of the US operations and the fluctuations in the Canada-US dollar exchange rate had significant impact on GWL's Canadian dollar consolidated financial statements, affecting its debt-to-equity ratio, borrowing capacity and credit rating.

In characterising the swaps, the Court emphasised that it is important to identify the risk to which the transaction relates and determine whether the item at risk (whether a debt obligation or foreign investment) is capital or income in nature. GWL's intention was to hedge its US investment (which was on capital account) and protect against currency risk that impacted its capital structure. Absent the investment, GWL would not have entered into the swaps since it did not, as a matter of policy, generally participate in derivatives. The Court concluded that the swap was sufficiently linked to GWL's indirect capital investment and was intended to hedge the associated currency risk even though there was no contemplated sale of the investment at the time the swap was entered into. The fact that the swaps were terminated when the taxpayer decided it was no longer necessary to hedge such foreign currency risk did not alter that conclusion.

Taxpayers may want to revisit their characterisation of hedging transactions for Canadian tax purposes in light of this decision.

Carrie Aiken ( and Daniel Jankovic (, Calgary

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 403 260 9775 and +1 403 260 9725


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Shareholders are set to vote on whether the asset management firm will adopt public CbCR, amid claims of tax avoidance.
US lawmakers averted a default on debt by approving the Fiscal Responsibility Act, but this deal may consolidate the Biden tax reforms rather than undermine them.
In a letter to the Australian Senate, the firm has provided the names of all 67 staff who received confidential emails but has not released them publicly.
David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.
The OECD has announced that a TP training programme is about to conclude in West Africa, a region that has been plagued by mispricing activities for a number of years.
Richard Murphy and Andrew Baker make the case for tax transparency as a public good and how key principles should lead to a better tax system.
‘Go on leave, effective immediately’, PwC has told nine partners in the latest development in the firm’s ongoing tax scandal.
The forum heard that VAT professionals are struggling under new pressures to validate transactions and catch fraud, responsibilities that they say should lie with governments.