Switzerland: How Switzerland intends to implement BEPS

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: How Switzerland intends to implement BEPS

Habermacher-Hans-Rudolf-100
Stocker-Raoul-100

Hans Rudolf Habermacher

Raoul Stocker

Switzerland plans to implement the country-by-country reporting (CbCR) and exchange of information provisions recommended by the OECD as part of its final package of measures to counter tax base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS).

On October 5 the OECD presented its final BEPS action reports. In parallel, the Swiss Government presented its plans on how it intends to implement any compulsory changes which have not already been incorporated in the latest draft of the Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III). The two major changes have been announced whereby Swiss-based multinationals would be requested to prepare and submit reporting on a country-by-country basis (BEPS action 13) and indicating that Switzerland intends to participate in the exchange of information between tax authorities on taxpayer-specific rulings (BEPS action 5).

Both changes will require an alteration of the Swiss legislation. Given the nature of the Swiss federal parliamentary process, the proposed legislations will be submitted to parliament in 2016 and are unlikely to enter into force before 2018. For CbCR in particular, the government plans to give companies and the tax administration sufficient time to implement mechanisms to deal with the new reporting requirement.

The planned timing for CBCR will mean that Switzerland cannot meet the proposed timetable of the OECD. As a result, Swiss-based multinational companies would have to resort to the alternative approach proposed by the OECD and submit their reporting via one of their group entities located in another country until the legislative process to allow this information to be submitted in Switzerland is complete.

Switzerland has a long-lasting tradition that companies may seek unilateral tax rulings which provide them with a unique level of certainty for their tax planning. By participating in the exchange of information the Swiss tax administration in future will need to provide information about existing rulings to foreign tax administrations upon request. The Swiss government has indicated, however, that it would only share information on tax rulings which are still valid on the date when the planned legislative change will take effect.

Besides the planned legislative changes, taxpayers should be aware of the fact that in the absence of specific transfer pricing legislation the Swiss tax administration refers to the OECD transfer pricing guidelines when assessing taxpayers. In this respect it is important to note that reference will automatically be made to the amended OECD TP guidelines when assessing future tax years (BEPS actions 8 – 10 and 13).

We recommend that companies review and assess possible effects of the BEPS initiative as well as the planned legislative changes on their tax and transfer pricing planning and take appropriate measures as necessary.

Hans Rudolf Habermacher (hhabermacher@deloitte.ch) and Raoul Stocker (rstocker@deloitte.ch)
Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6327 and +41 58 279 6271

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article