International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malta: Inland Revenue department issues FATCA guidelines



Donald Vella

Mark Galea Salomone

On December 16 2013 Malta and the US signed an agreement to improve international tax compliance and to implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) provisions. The FATCA agreement was incorporated into Maltese law by virtue of Legal Notice 78 of 2014. The Maltese Inland Revenue Department recently issued guidelines for the implementation of the FATCA agreement and the FATCA regulations in Malta providing insight into what is expected of Malta financial institutions to comply with FATCA. The FATCA regulations provide that the FATCA agreement and the FATCA regulations are to be interpreted in accordance with the FATCA guidelines, unless it is clear that the context requires otherwise.


Malta financial institutions need to register with the Maltese Commissioner for Revenue for FATCA purposes even if they are non-reporting financial institutions. Each Malta financial institution is also required to register with the US IRS and obtain a Global Intermediary Identification Number (GIIN). The FATCA guidelines exclude non-reporting Malta financial institutions, deemed-compliant Malta financial institutions and active and passive non-financial foreign entities from registering with the IRS. In the case of a financial institution with a local client base that has a reporting obligation due to it holding US reportable accounts, a GIIN will be required.

Compliance and reporting

Once the requisite procedure and due diligence, as detailed in the FATCA regulations and FATCA guidelines, is carried out and a Malta financial institution has identified reportable accounts, it must report certain information to the Commissioner of Revenue (for instance: name, address, US tax information number and account balance). It is important to note that where a reporting financial institution has no information to report, a nil return is still required.

The FATCA guidelines state that significant non-compliance may be determined from either an IRS or the Commissioner for Revenue's perspective. Examples provided include: (i) repeated failure to file a return or repeated late filing; (ii) ongoing or repeated failure to register, supply accurate information or establish appropriate due diligence processes; (iii) intentional provision of substantially incorrect information; or (iv) deliberate or negligent omission of required information.

The FATCA guidelines do not provide a concrete definition of "transactions and schemes" carried out by persons to avoid the obligations placed upon them by the FATCA regulations. It is however intended that the phrase will be interpreted widely and the effect of the anti-avoidance regulation is that the FATCA regulations will apply as if the transactions and schemes had not been entered into.

Should a Malta financial institution fail to comply and report, the mechanics of FATCA will come into play and a 30% withholding tax imposed on the US source income will apply. The FATCA guideline has provided much needed context to the FATCA regulations as the Inland Revenue Department continues to encourage Malta financial institutions to comply with FATCA.

Donald Vella ( and Mark Galea Salomone (

Camilleri Preziosi

Tel: +356 212 38989


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.
The OECD’s rules may be impossible for businesses to manage, according to tax experts from companies including Shell.
The UK government is now committed to replacing the ‘super-deduction’ with a 100% capital allowances regime to offset the impact of the corporate tax rise to 25%.
Corporate tax is set to rise in the UK for the first time in decades, but the headline rate remains historically low despite what many observers think.
President Joe Biden’s nominee is set to be confirmed as IRS commissioner for a five-year term.
British companies are waiting to hear the details of what will replace the 130% ‘super-deduction’ next week, while Spain considers stopping a major infrastructure company moving to the Netherlands.
President Joe Biden wants to raise corporate tax and impose a higher stock buyback tax on US businesses, but his budget proposal faces insurmountable obstacles in Congress, writes Ralph Cunningham.