International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: New decree extends Patent Box regime to commercial trademarks and introduces tax measures for “indirect lending”

foglia.jpg

emma.jpg

Giuliano Foglia


Marco Emma

With the so-called "Investment Compact" decree (Law Decree no. 3 of January 24 2015), the Italian Government introduced certain urgent measures to support the banking system and also to encourage investment. Article 5 of the decree amends the Patent Box to improve its attractiveness, keeping the overall structure of the beneficial regime recently adopted (see our Italy update in the December/January issue).

The most favourable adjustment is to the regime's scope of application: together with patents, formula, process and similar creations of the mind, the discounted tax rate may now apply to any kind of trademarks (including purely commercial ones), designs and models capable of legal protection.

Similarly to the original version of the regime, only taxpayers involved in qualifying research and development (R&D) activities may be admitted to the Patent Box regime. However, the decree now allows that such R&D activities may be also outsourced to any third (unrelated) party and not only to universities or similar research entities, as initially required.

The decree also confirmed that, as per the OECD's nexus approach, only part of the income deriving from intellectual property (IP) would be exempt, based on the ratio of (A) R&D expenses borne to maintain, increase and develop the intangible asset to (B) total expenses sustained for the creation of such IP right. For such purposes, expenses sustained for R&D activities (i) directly carried out by the taxpayers or (ii) outsourced to third (unrelated) parties are fully qualified for the regime. In addition, pursuant to the new decree, expenses (iii) borne for R&D activities outsourced to related entities (intra-group) and those (iv) sustained to acquire IP rights are now also taken into account, although up to the limit of 30% of the sum of the fully eligible R&D expenses under (i) and (ii) above. In other words, costs for IP acquisition and for R&D activities outsourced to related parties now also count for the nexus approach computation, but they would grant a full benefit only if resulting in 30% or less of the other "original" qualifying expenses under (i) and (ii).

Finally, in relation to the Patent Box regime the ruling procedure is no longer compulsory for intra-group transactions but is still necessary in relation to income stemming from direct use of IP rights.

The Investment Compact also includes tax measures to support access to alternative forms of "indirect" foreign financing. In particular, article 6 of the decree extended the scope of application of the exemption from Italian withholding tax to foreign institutional investors participating indirectly to banking financing transactions (that is, institutional investors providing funds to Italian lending banks). Only institutional investors established in "white-list" countries and subject to surveillance therein are able to take advantage of the exemption.

The measures enacted by the decree are in force as from January 25 2014. However, amendments could be passed during the process of conversion of the Decree into law by Parliament. If not converted before March 26, the decree must be deemed as retroactively non-effective.

Giuliano Foglia (foglia@virtax.it) and Marco Emma (emma@virtax.it)

Tremonti Vitali Romagnoli Piccardi e Associati

Tel: +39 06 3218022 (Rome) +39 02 58313707 (Milan)

Website: www.virtax.it

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.