Italy: New decree extends Patent Box regime to commercial trademarks and introduces tax measures for “indirect lending”

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: New decree extends Patent Box regime to commercial trademarks and introduces tax measures for “indirect lending”

foglia.jpg

emma.jpg

Giuliano Foglia


Marco Emma

With the so-called "Investment Compact" decree (Law Decree no. 3 of January 24 2015), the Italian Government introduced certain urgent measures to support the banking system and also to encourage investment. Article 5 of the decree amends the Patent Box to improve its attractiveness, keeping the overall structure of the beneficial regime recently adopted (see our Italy update in the December/January issue).

The most favourable adjustment is to the regime's scope of application: together with patents, formula, process and similar creations of the mind, the discounted tax rate may now apply to any kind of trademarks (including purely commercial ones), designs and models capable of legal protection.

Similarly to the original version of the regime, only taxpayers involved in qualifying research and development (R&D) activities may be admitted to the Patent Box regime. However, the decree now allows that such R&D activities may be also outsourced to any third (unrelated) party and not only to universities or similar research entities, as initially required.

The decree also confirmed that, as per the OECD's nexus approach, only part of the income deriving from intellectual property (IP) would be exempt, based on the ratio of (A) R&D expenses borne to maintain, increase and develop the intangible asset to (B) total expenses sustained for the creation of such IP right. For such purposes, expenses sustained for R&D activities (i) directly carried out by the taxpayers or (ii) outsourced to third (unrelated) parties are fully qualified for the regime. In addition, pursuant to the new decree, expenses (iii) borne for R&D activities outsourced to related entities (intra-group) and those (iv) sustained to acquire IP rights are now also taken into account, although up to the limit of 30% of the sum of the fully eligible R&D expenses under (i) and (ii) above. In other words, costs for IP acquisition and for R&D activities outsourced to related parties now also count for the nexus approach computation, but they would grant a full benefit only if resulting in 30% or less of the other "original" qualifying expenses under (i) and (ii).

Finally, in relation to the Patent Box regime the ruling procedure is no longer compulsory for intra-group transactions but is still necessary in relation to income stemming from direct use of IP rights.

The Investment Compact also includes tax measures to support access to alternative forms of "indirect" foreign financing. In particular, article 6 of the decree extended the scope of application of the exemption from Italian withholding tax to foreign institutional investors participating indirectly to banking financing transactions (that is, institutional investors providing funds to Italian lending banks). Only institutional investors established in "white-list" countries and subject to surveillance therein are able to take advantage of the exemption.

The measures enacted by the decree are in force as from January 25 2014. However, amendments could be passed during the process of conversion of the Decree into law by Parliament. If not converted before March 26, the decree must be deemed as retroactively non-effective.

Giuliano Foglia (foglia@virtax.it) and Marco Emma (emma@virtax.it)

Tremonti Vitali Romagnoli Piccardi e Associati

Tel: +39 06 3218022 (Rome) +39 02 58313707 (Milan)

Website: www.virtax.it

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Gift this article