International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cyprus: The amended Cyprus IP box regime


Zoe Kokoni

The Cyprus House of Representatives approve legislative proposals for a revised intellectual property (IP) box regime on October 14 2016.

The changes are significant and will have a direct impact on existing or planned structures.

The relevant amendments intend to harmonise the domestic legislation with recommendations under Action 5 of the OECD's BEPS Project and the conclusions adopted by the ECOFIN Council on December 8 2015.

The revised legislation has retroactive effect from July 1 2016. The specific provisions comprising the new IP box regime in Cyprus are summarised below.

Qualifying intangible assets

Qualifying intangible assets refer to assets that were acquired, developed or exploited by a person in the course of his business (excluding IP associated with marketing) and which pertains to research and development activities for which economic ownership exists. Specifically, these assets are:

  • Patents as defined in the Patents Law;

  • Computer software;

  • Other IP assets that are non-obvious, novel and useful, where the person which utilises them in the further development of a business does not generate annual gross revenues exceeding €7.5 million ($8 million) (or €50 million for a group of companies) and which should be certified by an appropriate authority either in Cyprus or abroad; and

  • Utility models, IP assets that provide protection to plants and generic material, orphan drug designations and extensions of protections of patents, all of which should be legally protected.

It should be noted that rights used for the marketing of products and services such as business names, brands, trademarks, image rights, etc. are not considered as qualifying intangible assets.

Qualifying profits

Qualifying profits (income) relates to the proportion of the total income that relates to the fraction of the qualifying expenditure, as well as the uplift expenditure that was incurred for the qualifying intangible asset. Such income, for example, consists of royalties in connection with the use of the qualifying intangible asset and capital gains arising on the disposal of a qualifying intangible asset, among others.

Overall income

The overall income refers to the total income arising on the qualifying intangible asset within a specific tax year reduced by the direct costs for generating this income.

As with the previous IP box regime, 80% of the overall income as defined above is treated as a deductible expense, and in the same manner as losses only 20% of the loss can be carried forward or be surrendered for the purpose of group loss relief.

Qualifying expenditure

Qualifying expenditure for a qualifying intangible asset relates to the total R&D costs incurred in any tax year wholly and exclusively for the development, improvement, or creation of qualifying intangible assets and where costs are directly related to the qualifying intangible assets.

Examples of such qualifying expenditure includes wages and salaries, direct costs relating to the R&D, including costs that have been outsourced, supplies related to R&D, installations used for R&D, among others.

An uplift expenditure is added to the above mentioned qualifying expenditure which is the lower of:

  • 30% of the eligible costs; or

  • The total amount of the cost of acquisition and outsourcing to related parties aimed at R&D in connection to the eligible intangible asset.

Accounting records

Proper books of accounting and records of income and expenses must be kept for each intangible asset by any person who wishes to claim the above described benefit.

Zoe Kokoni (

Eurofast Taxand Cyprus

Tel: +357 22699222


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.