All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Spain: Potential recovery of Spanish energy taxes

intl-updates-small.jpg

Taxpayers may be able to recover several years of paid energy taxes under a long-awaited opinion from the Supreme Court on whether certain taxes are constitutional.

cobos.jpg

José María Cobos

Background

On January 1 2013, the Energy Sustainability Law 15/2012 of December 27 2012 was enacted, which introduced several new taxes to harmonise the Spanish tax system that intended to promote more efficient environmental and sustainability practices. These objectives of the Law inspired tax reform in Spain in line with the basic principles governing tax, energy and environmental policy in the European Union.

The Law created the following taxes, among others:

  • Tax on the production value of electricity;

  • Tax on the production of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste resulting from the generation of nuclear energy; and

  • Tax on storage of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste at centralised facilities.

Despite the environmental objectives of these taxes, doubts arose over the true aim of these new tax items and whether they complied with the Spanish Constitution and Community Directives.

Constitutional questions

In this context, the Supreme Court referred two requests to the Constitutional Court on June 14 2016, asking for a ruling on unconstitutionality in relation to these taxes. The Supreme Court has claimed the tax measures are unconstitutional on the grounds that they might infringe the "ability-to-pay" principle established in Article 31 of the Spanish Constitution.

The first request for a ruling on unconstitutionality referred to the tax on the production value of electricity. The Supreme Court said that there are serious doubts about its environmental aim, given that:

  • None of the elements that compose the tax are geared towards the internalisation of the environmental costs derived from the production of electricity;

  • It is observed that this tax is levied on the same ability to pay as that on which economic activities tax is charged; and

  • As there is no clear environmental aim to justify this double taxation, this tax could breach Article 31 of the Spanish Constitution.

The second request for a ruling on unconstitutionality referred to the tax on the production of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste resulting from the generation of nuclear energy, and the tax on storage of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste at centralised facilities. The Supreme Court considered that:

  • The objectives of the taxes are already covered by the charges established in the legislation of the electricity industry;

  • None of the elements in the make-up of the tax are aimed at discouraging pollution or stimulating other conducts;

  • These taxes are simply a charge on the production and storage of radioactive waste. Therefore, their true aim is to finance the tariff deficit of nuclear power plants; and

  • In short, the court has serious doubts about the environmental nature of these taxes and their compliance with Article 31 of the Constitution, as there could be several tax items being levied on the same manifestation of wealth.

The Supreme Court has not given an opinion on the possible incompatibility of these taxes with European Union law. The analysis of that question, if necessary, is being deferred until the Constitutional Court has ruled on the strictly national questions.

In view of this situation, while the doubts about the compatibility of these taxes are being resolved, taxpayers should consider whether to contest the self-assessments of these taxes to maintain the right to recover the excess amounts paid if these taxes are rendered null and void.

José María Cobos (jose.maria.cobos@garrigues.com), Madrid

Garrigues

Website: www.garrigues.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UN’s decision to seek a leadership role in global tax policy could be a crucial turning point but won’t be the end of the OECD, say tax experts.
The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2023 ITR Tax Awards in Asia-Pacific, Europe Middle East & Africa, and the Americas.
Tax authorities and customs are failing multinationals by creating uncertainty with contradictory assessment and guidance, say in-house tax directors.
The CJEU said the General Court erred in law when it ruled that both companies benefitted from Italian state aid.
An OECD report reveals multinationals have continued to shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions, reinforcing the case for strong multilateral action in response.
The UK government announced plans to increase taxes on oil and gas profits, while the Irish government considers its next move on tax reform.
War and COVID have highlighted companies’ unpreparedness to deal with sudden geo-political changes, say TP specialists.
A source who has seen the draft law said it brings clarity on intangibles and other areas of TP including tax planning.