Russia: Russia amends tax laws to involve taxpayers in audits with higher tax authorities

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Russia: Russia amends tax laws to involve taxpayers in audits with higher tax authorities

grinko.jpg

Alexander Grinko

In order to improve the examination of tax audit materials and tax control procedures, amendments to the Tax Code of the Russian Federation have been adopted.

The amendments in Federal Law No. 130-FZ, dated May 1 2016, "On Amendments to Part One of the Tax Code" (the Amended Tax Law), will provide greater transparency and fairness when the tax authorities are issuing decisions based on the results of tax control measures.

Involving the taxpayer

The Amended Tax Law provides additional grounds for a taxpayer to exert their right to be involved in the examination of tax audit materials by a higher tax authority. These rights can be used:

  • If there are contradictions in the information contained in the junior tax authority's material; or

  • If there is inconsistency between the information submitted by the taxpayer and the information contained in the materials of the junior tax authority.

Before adopting the Amended Tax Law, there was only one basis on which a taxpayer could be given the right to be involved in examining tax audit materials with a higher tax authority. This was if the junior tax authority had violated significant procedural conditions during the examination of tax audit materials.

Key changes

In recent years, the higher tax authorities have significantly improved the way they treat appeals against the conclusions of examinations and the resulting decisions conducted by junior tax authorities, and have reversed a significant number of the decisions of the junior tax authorities (e.g. 33.8% of appeals in Russia in 2015 were overturned in favour of the taxpayers). These amendments add substantial additional value to taxpayers.

The legislative amendments will most likely lead to improved examinations and more objective final decisions by the tax authorities at the pre-trial stage.

The amendments also provide taxpayers with the opportunity to be involved in reviewing the reason for an appeal, as well as all audit materials and additionally submitted documents with lawyers and other professionals working at the higher tax authority, delivering a higher level of examination.

It also gives the taxpayer the opportunity to provide sound oral reasoning, and to discuss issues/questions with members of the group examining the case, including the chief/deputy chief of the higher tax authority (the person who will issue the appeal decision).

As such, pre-trial tax dispute examinations will become more complex and longer.

As a result of these amendments, Russian taxpayers, after two direct oral interrogations, will receive more complex analysis of the issues pertinent to their case, and so be able to give and gain additional information to decide whether they should begin litigation proceedings against the tax authority.

The amendments affect appeals submitted after June 2 2016.

Alexander Grinko (agrinko@kpmg.ru)

KPMG in Russia and the CIS

Tel: +7 (495) 937 44 77

Website: www.kpmg.ru

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article