International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: New Zealand releases overview of tax policy settings for inbound investment


James Lester

The New Zealand Inland Revenue and Treasury have released a draft report outlining the current policy framework for taxing income earned on inbound investment into New Zealand (New Zealand's taxation framework for inbound investment, June 2016).

New Zealand relies heavily on inbound investment to fund its capital stock, and the report provides a timely reminder of the government's approach in this area. This is particularly the case in relation to reforms that have been recommended by the OECD in its BEPS action plan.

Two possible areas of reform currently on the New Zealand government's tax policy work programme are rules to address hybrid mismatches (BEPS Action 2) and the possibility of tighter interest limitation provisions to prevent profit stripping through deductible interest payments (BEPS Action 4). Officials plan to invite public consultation on both issues in late August 2016.

In addition, draft legislation limiting exemptions from non-resident withholding tax (NRWT) on interest is being debated in parliament and is expected to be enacted later this year or early in 2017.

Policy conclusions

The principal policy conclusions of the June report are summarised as follows:

  • The levying of income tax on companies and NRWT on income from certain activities carried on in New Zealand remains an appropriate way in which to tax income earned on inbound investment. Moreover, the report concludes that New Zealand's current tax settings in this regard are broadly consistent with international norms;

  • NRWT on interest from related-party debt is said to play an important role in ensuring income from money lent in New Zealand is brought to tax in New Zealand; and

  • Base-protection measures (including transfer pricing and thin capitalisation rules) are necessary to strengthen the taxation measures applicable to inbound investment. More generally, base-protection measures should target the exploitation of deviations from "normal" tax outcomes by non-resident investors. The report observes that such deviations can result in low-tax investors being substituted for tax-paying investors in respect of a given investment, which would reduce national income without necessarily increasing investment in New Zealand (or without reducing the pre-tax cost of capital to New Zealand).


As noted above, officials will be consulting on further base-protection measures (targeting hybrid mismatches and interest limitation provisions) arising from the OECD's work on BEPS.

While the June report provides a useful overview of the key policy considerations relevant to taxing inbound investment, the formulation of tax rules in the area of international investment will always call for difficult decisions and judgement calls.

It will be interesting to see how the New Zealand government applies the policy considerations outlined in the report as it weighs up the options for reform. This is especially so in the case of measures such as withholding tax reforms, anti-hybrid measures and any tightening of interest deductibility settings, all of which could drive up the cost of capital at a time when New Zealand requires significant levels of foreign capital to improve its infrastructure and meet the government's business growth agenda.

James Lester (

Russell McVeagh

Tel: +64 4 819 7755


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023