International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: Another wide interpretation of royalties against the digital economy


Ilias Sakellariou

Greece has always adopted a very broad interpretation of what it considers as royalties in the context of its double tax treaties (DTAs), based on specific observations and the reservation that it has expressed on Article 12 of the OECD Model Tax Convention.

The Greek Income Tax Code remains loyal to this practice by including in its definition of royalties, among others, the right to use software for commercial exploitation or personal use. The Greek General Secretariat of Public Revenues has tried to narrow the royalties' application in Greece by issuing administrative guidance. However, the exact interpretation of what is considered as software remains unclear because the term has been traditionally stretched by the Greek tax authorities to include almost all aspects of the electronic and digital economy. Taxpayers have challenged this view in various instances and cases, which have reached the Greek Supreme Administrative Court, but the results have been mixed and there has been no conclusive decision yet.

In a recent example, a Greek advertising company provided marketing services to Greek clients, including placing online advertisements on an online global social network. The advertising company filed a written query to the Greek Ministry of Finance, asking if the payment of advertising fees to the Irish social network company constituted a payment of royalties in the context of the DTA between Greece and Ireland. The competent Directorate of International Economic Relationships of the ministry replied that, regarding the DTAs that Greece has signed with other states, income arising in a Contracting State by a resident of the other Contracting State in return for "the use of software of a platform for placing advertisements" is included in the definition of royalties, taking into account Greece's observations on Article 12.

As a result, it seems that the Greek authorities continue to understand anything digital or connected to the internet as software and use of software and, thus, as royalties. However, this is a result that is not in line with the conclusions and recommendations of the OECD BEPS Action 1 report on the digital economy. For example, the report clearly states that the digital economy should not be ring-fenced from the rest of the economy for tax purposes. On the contrary, this is exactly what is happening in Greek practice, meaning that the same business activities (e.g. advertising activities) are treated differently depending on their being digitalised or not.

On another note, it is rumoured that Greece is also ready to introduce a new withholding tax of 3%, which will be imposed specifically to payments for short-term accommodation rentals that take place through internet sharing economy sites, but the exact mechanism and details of this are still unknown.

Overall, given that Greece has been a strong BEPS supporter, perhaps the authorities could wait and not rush in to defining anything as software and royalties when dealing with all these new business models (e.g. SaaS, IaaS, PaaS, XaaS, Cloud computing, UCC platforms etc.). Furthermore, the BEPS report recognises the need to monitor the developments on the exact impact of the changes and has therefore extended its research on them to 2020. If Greece does not hold back, its practice will probably cause more problems and economic disparities in the near future because of the exponential development of the digital economy and the emergence of innovative and unpredictable business models that will continue to challenge our way of thinking, living and doing business.

Ilias Sakellariou (, Marousi


Tel: +30 210 2886 000


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and how tax authorities are responding.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.
The OECD’s rules may be impossible for businesses to manage, according to tax experts from companies including Shell.