International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Russia: Companies must comply with new waste rules or face environmental tax


Andrey Ermolaev

Many companies this year have fallen within the scope of new regulations on the disposal of consumer products and packaging waste.

This is a direct result of amendments to Federal Law No. 89-FZ of June 24 1998 "On the Production and Consumption of Waste" (as amended on December 29 2015) (the "Law"), which extended the definition of waste disposal and imposed obligations to recycle or pay an environmental duty.

Usually, the law is interpreted to mean that "waste disposal" is the destruction of products by land burial or incineration (for example, when a product's shelf life expires, or when it degrades and ceases to be marketable).

The amended Law provides a new definition, stating that waste disposal is the reprocessing of waste for recycling purposes.

The Law covers both producers and importers. It stipulates that they have to take responsibility for the annual recycling of waste from the use of certain goods (and their packaging) to meet the established recycling targets, which were set by Decree No. 2491-r, dated December 4 2015. Alternatively, they have an obligation to pay an environmental duty calculated on the basis of specific rates, set by Resolution No. 284, dated April 9 2016, if the recycling targets are not met or if, following a decision by the company, no attempt to recycle the waste was made. These amendments, in turn, have introduced new reporting requirements.

The Russian government has published a list of finished goods regulated by Decree No. 1886-r of September 24 2015 "On the List of Finished Goods, including Packaging, to be Recycled at the End of Their Usable Life" (the "List"). After reviewing this List, it becomes clear that companies in almost every sector will have the obligation to carry out recycling procedures or pay an environmental duty.

The List includes automobile manufacturers (obliged to dispose of waste tyres and solid rubber products), pharmaceutical companies, consumer-facing enterprises, retail and light industry sectors, electronics manufacturers, and many more.

Given that the packaging disposal burden lies with producers and importers, the Law affects almost every Russian company.

Law requires further clarity and explanation

Despite the fact that the Law is already in force and the obligation to submit reports became effective from April 1 2016, the legislation has not been finalised yet and requires a number of explanations and clarifications. These primarily relate to the challenges companies face when preparing their regular accounts. Among other things, an amendment has introduced a requirement to specify the name and amount of goods and packaging used when importing goods or introducing them to the market with an accuracy of one kilogram. In most cases, neither customs declarations, nor accounting reports, provide this kind of information.

In addition to this, there are other significant issues that have still not been resolved by legislators.

Although producers and importers bear no responsibility for failures to comply with waste disposal requirements or to submit reports in 2016, this year will still be important for both producers and importers. If the lack of reports or incorrect data result in no liabilities this year, this will fundamentally change in 2017 and thereafter.

Most companies are wrong in believing that they fall within the scope of the Law by identifying waste disposal as the traditional destruction of products and due to their goods being absent from the List, disregarding the packaging in which the goods are imported or introduced to the market.

In our opinion, producers and importers should check to see if their products and packaging are on the List, as well as analyse how many of their products and imports already fall under its scope.

If companies know that their products and packaging come under the List's scope, they should not only develop and set up inventory accounting procedures, but also choose the most convenient and beneficial option for them: whether to take responsibility for the entire recycling procedure, establish associations (unions) for professional disposal, or pay the environmental duty.

Andrey Ermolaev (

KPMG in Russia and the CIS

Tel: +7 (495) 937 44 77


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023