Ireland: Guidance published on secondary reporting mechanism for CbC reporting
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ireland: Guidance published on secondary reporting mechanism for CbC reporting

duffy.jpg
hogan.jpg

Joe Duffy

Shane Hogan

During June 2016, the Irish Revenue Commissioners (Irish Revenue) published guidance on the secondary reporting mechanism included in Ireland's legislation implementing the OECD's recommendations on country-by-country (CbC) reporting.

While the legislation primarily provides for the filing of CbC reports by Irish headquartered multinationals, in certain circumstances multinationals operating in Ireland that are headquartered elsewhere will also be required to make CbC filings in Ireland.

The secondary reporting mechanism is particularly relevant for multinational groups headquartered in jurisdictions that have not implemented CbC reporting for financial years beginning on or after January 1 2016 (e.g. the US) and have Irish operations.

Ireland's secondary reporting mechanism

Under the Taxes (Country-by Country Reporting) Regulations 2015 (the Regulations), multinationals operating in Ireland that are headquartered elsewhere are obliged to file an 'equivalent CbC report' if:

  • the multinational group is not required to file a CbC report in its headquarter jurisdiction and the group has not appointed a surrogate parent to file a CbC report elsewhere;

  • the CbC report that has been filed in the headquarter jurisdiction (or, as the case may be, the surrogate parent jurisdiction) will not be provided to Irish Revenue as no exchange of information arrangements have been agreed by Ireland with that jurisdiction; or

  • there is systemic failure in the headquarter jurisdiction (or, as the case may be, the surrogate parent jurisdiction) in respect of its obligations under exchange of information arrangements agreed with Ireland.

As noted in guidance issued by the Irish Revenue, Ireland's secondary reporting mechanism differs from the recommendations made by the OECD under Action 13 of the BEPS project.

The report issued under Action 13 anticipated that full CbC reports would be filed under the secondary reporting mechanism, whereas the Irish rules require an 'equivalent CbC report'.

Irish Revenue has explained that the reason for the difference in approach is that an entity in a multinational group that is neither the headquarter company nor a surrogate parent "may be limited in its capacity to provide a complete CbC Report with information for the full MNE Group".

Equivalent CbC report

An equivalent CbC report must include the same information as should be included in a CbC report but only to the extent that:

  • The information is within the custody or possession of the Irish entity; or

  • The Irish entity has the power to obtain that information.

In the guidance, Irish Revenue confirms that that equivalent CbC reports must "include inter alia information relating to the Irish tax resident constituent entity and its subsidiaries". Outside of that, Irish Revenue considers that the Irish entity "is best placed to determine what information it can provide" in the equivalent CbC report. Irish Revenue expects that those filing equivalent CbC reports will take a "reasonable, practical and consistent approach" to their obligations under the Regulations noting that the onus is on the taxpayer to ensure that the equivalent CbC report is complete and accurate.

The guidance also confirms that the penalty for failure to file an equivalent CbC report is €19,045 plus a daily fine for each day the failure continues (almost €1 million annually). The penalty for filing an incomplete or inaccurate equivalent CbC report is €19,045.

Exchange of equivalent CbC reports

Interestingly, the guidance confirms that as the requirement to file an equivalent CbC report is a local filing requirement only, Irish Revenue is not required to exchange those reports with other tax authorities.

Timing

The Regulations will apply for financial years beginning on or after January 1 2016. An equivalent CbC report must be filed within 12 months of the end of the financial year to which it relates (i.e. equivalent CbC reports in respect of financial years commencing on January 1 2016 must be filed by December 31 2017).

Joe Duffy (joseph.duffy@matheson.com) and Shane Hogan (shane.hogan@matheson.com)

Matheson

Tel: +353 1 232 2688 and +353 1 232 2453

Website: www.matheson.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As the firm declined to speak with ITR over its progress, senator Deborah O’Neill branded PwC Australia’s recent parliamentary responses as ‘unsatisfactory’
A Swedish company’s CEO working part-time in Denmark led to a noteworthy PE decision; in other news, Latham & Watkins grew its London tax team
Rather than outright replace human intelligence, AI solutions can serve as the ‘infinite intern’ tax advisers need to automate onerous tasks, argues Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
The lack of provision for bilateral advance pricing agreements is a notable omission from proposed reforms of Brazil’s transfer pricing rules
Ursula von der Leyen is under pressure to ensure her new team makes competitiveness a top priority. How tax policy is designed and implemented is crucial, writes Ralph Cunningham
Speaking exclusively at ITR’s Transfer Pricing Forum in Europe, the Commission’s Marc Clercx also addressed industry concerns over the arm’s-length principle
After a protracted offensive from 10 Australian professional bodies, a Senate motion to strike out contentious new tax ethical rules has failed, but concessions were secured
The closely watched decision represents the final nail in the coffin for Apple and serves as a warning to other multinationals, experts have suggested
UK tax advisers have branded Reeves’ pledge to cap corporation tax at 25% as “a smart move” and “an easy give”
In the wake of the global rankings release, we focus on the top performers across EMEA in the second of three regional analyses
Gift this article