Ireland: Guidance published on secondary reporting mechanism for CbC reporting

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ireland: Guidance published on secondary reporting mechanism for CbC reporting

duffy.jpg
hogan.jpg

Joe Duffy

Shane Hogan

During June 2016, the Irish Revenue Commissioners (Irish Revenue) published guidance on the secondary reporting mechanism included in Ireland's legislation implementing the OECD's recommendations on country-by-country (CbC) reporting.

While the legislation primarily provides for the filing of CbC reports by Irish headquartered multinationals, in certain circumstances multinationals operating in Ireland that are headquartered elsewhere will also be required to make CbC filings in Ireland.

The secondary reporting mechanism is particularly relevant for multinational groups headquartered in jurisdictions that have not implemented CbC reporting for financial years beginning on or after January 1 2016 (e.g. the US) and have Irish operations.

Ireland's secondary reporting mechanism

Under the Taxes (Country-by Country Reporting) Regulations 2015 (the Regulations), multinationals operating in Ireland that are headquartered elsewhere are obliged to file an 'equivalent CbC report' if:

  • the multinational group is not required to file a CbC report in its headquarter jurisdiction and the group has not appointed a surrogate parent to file a CbC report elsewhere;

  • the CbC report that has been filed in the headquarter jurisdiction (or, as the case may be, the surrogate parent jurisdiction) will not be provided to Irish Revenue as no exchange of information arrangements have been agreed by Ireland with that jurisdiction; or

  • there is systemic failure in the headquarter jurisdiction (or, as the case may be, the surrogate parent jurisdiction) in respect of its obligations under exchange of information arrangements agreed with Ireland.

As noted in guidance issued by the Irish Revenue, Ireland's secondary reporting mechanism differs from the recommendations made by the OECD under Action 13 of the BEPS project.

The report issued under Action 13 anticipated that full CbC reports would be filed under the secondary reporting mechanism, whereas the Irish rules require an 'equivalent CbC report'.

Irish Revenue has explained that the reason for the difference in approach is that an entity in a multinational group that is neither the headquarter company nor a surrogate parent "may be limited in its capacity to provide a complete CbC Report with information for the full MNE Group".

Equivalent CbC report

An equivalent CbC report must include the same information as should be included in a CbC report but only to the extent that:

  • The information is within the custody or possession of the Irish entity; or

  • The Irish entity has the power to obtain that information.

In the guidance, Irish Revenue confirms that that equivalent CbC reports must "include inter alia information relating to the Irish tax resident constituent entity and its subsidiaries". Outside of that, Irish Revenue considers that the Irish entity "is best placed to determine what information it can provide" in the equivalent CbC report. Irish Revenue expects that those filing equivalent CbC reports will take a "reasonable, practical and consistent approach" to their obligations under the Regulations noting that the onus is on the taxpayer to ensure that the equivalent CbC report is complete and accurate.

The guidance also confirms that the penalty for failure to file an equivalent CbC report is €19,045 plus a daily fine for each day the failure continues (almost €1 million annually). The penalty for filing an incomplete or inaccurate equivalent CbC report is €19,045.

Exchange of equivalent CbC reports

Interestingly, the guidance confirms that as the requirement to file an equivalent CbC report is a local filing requirement only, Irish Revenue is not required to exchange those reports with other tax authorities.

Timing

The Regulations will apply for financial years beginning on or after January 1 2016. An equivalent CbC report must be filed within 12 months of the end of the financial year to which it relates (i.e. equivalent CbC reports in respect of financial years commencing on January 1 2016 must be filed by December 31 2017).

Joe Duffy (joseph.duffy@matheson.com) and Shane Hogan (shane.hogan@matheson.com)

Matheson

Tel: +353 1 232 2688 and +353 1 232 2453

Website: www.matheson.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article