International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Important Deadline Approaching under Canada’s “upstream loan” Rules


Ian Caines

August 19 2016 will be an important deadline under Canada's "upstream loan" rules for foreign affiliates. After that date, the rules will begin to apply to certain historical intra-group indebtedness that was previously exempt due to a limited period of transitional relief.

Affected taxpayers may need to unwind historical arrangements, or otherwise reorganise their affairs, by the deadline in order to avoid adverse Canadian tax consequences.

The upstream loan rules are applicable in certain cases where a person (the debtor), receives a loan from, or otherwise becomes indebted to, a foreign affiliate of a Canadian resident and the debt is not repaid within two years. Generally speaking, these new rules apply in certain cases where the debtor is either the Canadian resident itself or another person not dealing at arm's-length with the Canadian resident (such as a Canadian or foreign parent of the Canadian resident, a subsidiary, or a sibling company in its corporate group). Where the rules apply to debt, the result is to include some or all of the amount of the debt in the income of the Canadian resident.

These rules generally apply to all debt, including debts incurred before the rules were enacted. However, special transitional relief provides that debt originally incurred by August 19 2011 is deemed to have been incurred on August 20 2014. As a result, the two-year threshold for such historical debt will be satisfied on August 20 2016, potentially resulting in a (retroactive) income inclusion and tax liability for the Canadian resident's 2014 taxation year.

There is also a transitional foreign exchange set-off rule that will, in certain circumstances, allow foreign exchange gains (or losses) realised on repayment of the debt to be set-off against foreign exchange losses (or gains) of the foreign affiliate resulting from such repayment. Such transitional foreign exchange set-off rule will also only apply if the loan in question is repaid on or before August 19 2016.

The consequences of the upstream loan rules may be avoided by repaying the relevant debt before the deadline, or by certain other means depending on the taxpayer's circumstances. Taxpayers potentially affected by these rules should consult with their tax advisers regarding any appropriate steps to be taken before the deadline.

Ian Caines (

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 416 863 5277


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Premier League football clubs are accused of avoiding paying up to £470 million in UK tax, while Malta is poised to overhaul its unique corporate tax system.
Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.