International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Understanding the new employee stock option plans


César Agliati

Ignacio Núñez

The tax treatment of Employee Stock Options (ESOPS) will change from January 1 2017 when the Tax Reform Law No. 20.780 of September 2014, included in Article 17 No. 8 of the Chilean Income tax law, incorporates new rules in order to apply taxes to the different stages of an ESOP.

Under these new criteria, the taxation of an ESOP could be triggered when they are granted because the new law states that being "able to subscribe an ESOP" would generate a benefit for the employee, counselor or director. In this case, the difference between the valuation of the option and the price paid by the employee in order to subscribe to the ESOP, if any was paid, would be the taxable income.

Circular Letter No. 70 of 2015, which interprets the new ESOP rules, indicates that the benefit obtained at the time of the granting of an ESOP could be used at the time of the transfer of the ESOP to a third party as part of its cost, so the triggered taxation would amount to the difference between the benefit obtained on the day granted and the price of sale of the option.

Existing rules

Before the 2014 Tax Reform Law, the tax treatment of ESOPS was only addressed through rulings by the Chilean Internal Revenue Service because they were excluded from the Derivatives Law No. 20.544 of 2011.

The existing tax treatment of the ESOPS, which will be applicable until December 31 2016, depends on whether the ESOPS were given as part of employment remuneration or if they were acquired by the worker using their own income.

ESOPS are taxable at the exercise day, which means that the difference between the price of the shares at the day of the exercise of the ESOPS and its acquisition cost would be treated as a higher remuneration subject to employment income tax law.

If the shares were acquired by the employee with his own resources, the ESOPS would be only taxable at the point of sale of the exercised shares. This means that the granting, vesting and exercise of the ESOPS would not trigger any taxable event as long as no capital gain is generated due to the sale of shares.

Finally, the Chilean Income Tax Law permits the accruing of employment benefits for the lifespan of the corresponding benefit, in the case of benefits established in employment contracts and for a 12 month period since its granting, if it was a voluntary benefit.

New tax application

The applicable taxation to the exercise of an ESOP would amount to the difference between the book or market value of the shares included in the ESOP and the benefit originally obtained at the granting of the ESOP under the new rules entering into force.

Under these new rules, it is important for companies to examine the clauses and content of any ESOP plan carefully because tax could be applied at any given stage of an ESOP.

Existing legislation has not solved the tax treatment of the Option granted to the employees as deductible expenses for the company.

If the exercise price of the ESOP is inferior to the cost of the shares acquired by the company, the Chilean Internal Revenue Service has not indicated whether the company would be able to consider that amount as a deductible expense or if it would be considered as a rejected expense subject to a sole tax of 40% (from 2017 onwards). Furthermore, the valuation rules applicable in order to determine the cost of the shares for the company, are not clear enough in the existing legislation.

Also, under the new ESOP rules, the accruing of the benefits for the employee and how they are going to recognize it in their tax returns is still being discussed.

Once the Chilean Internal Revenue Service starts to audit ESOPS, we should be able to distinguish between ESOPS or any other kind of instruments that are preferable as employment benefits.

César Agliati ( and Ignacio Núñez (

PwC Chile

Tel: +56 2 2940 0000


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial measure is being watered down after criticism from the European Central Bank.
More than 600 such requests were made in 2022, while HMRC has also bolstered its fraud service, it has been revealed.
The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.