International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss securities transfer tax – No new treatment for Swiss fund managers


Markus Weber

André Kuhn

Recent statements made by experts from the Swiss Federal Tax Administration (SFTA) towards Swiss fund managers and banks appeared to suggest that there is a new practice in place.

There is no new practice. The issue is that Swiss collective investment schemes are exempt investors for Swiss securities transfer tax (SSTT) purposes, whereas Swiss fund management companies are not. If the fund management company holds brokerage accounts with banks in its own name but for the account of the collective investment scheme, it becomes the counterparty in the transaction for SSTT purposes and the bank/broker has to levy half of the SSTT if the fund management company does not identify itself as a Swiss securities dealer (SSD).

To avoid the issue, affected fund managers must ensure that the relevant accounts are always opened directly in the name of the collective investment scheme and not in the name of the fund management company. Alternatively, the fund management company identifies itself as an SSD towards the bank/broker by providing its blue SSD card and therefore becomes responsible for recording the transaction in its SSTT journal.

In both cases, no SSTT on transactions for the benefit of the collective investment scheme will be levied. However, under the second option, the burden of keeping a journal lies with the fund management company. A fund management company may request the SFTA to keep a simplified journal in order to avoid unnecessary administrative burdens. Outsourcing the journal maintenance back to the bank/broker is allowed, but the entries must show the collective investment scheme as party to the transaction, not the fund management company.

In essence, the correct formal setup is key when dealing with SSTT as there is no room for a substance-over-form approach.

Markus Weber ( and André Kuhn (


Tel: +41 58 279 7527 and +41 58 279 6328


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The forum heard that VAT professionals are struggling under new pressures to validate transactions and catch fraud, responsibilities that they say should lie with governments.
The working paper suggested a new framework for boosting effective carbon rates and reducing the inconsistency of climate policy.
UAE firm Virtuzone launches ‘TaxGPT’, claiming it is the first AI-powered tax tool, while the Australian police faces claims of a conflict of interest over its PwC audit contract.
The US technology company is defending its past Irish tax arrangements at the CJEU in a final showdown that could have major political repercussions.
ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum heard that Italy’s VAT investigation into Meta has the potential to set new and expensive tax principles that would likely be adopted around the world
Police are now investigating the leak of confidential tax information by a former PwC partner at the request of the Australian government.
A VAT policy officer at the European Commission told the forum that the initial deadline set for EU convergence of domestic digital VAT reporting is likely to be extended.
The UK government shows little sign of cutting corporate tax, while a growing number of businesses report a decline in investment as a result of the higher tax burden.
Mariana Morais Teixeira of Morais Leitão overviews Portugal’s new tax incentive regime designed to boost the country’s capital-depleted private sector.
Septian Fachrizal, TP analyst at the Directorate General of Taxes, outlines how Indonesia is relying heavily on the successful implementation of pillar one.