Malta: Notional interest deduction rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malta: Notional interest deduction rules

intl-updates-small.jpg

The Maltese notional interest deduction rules (the rules) were published on October 5 2017, further to an announcement made in the previous 2017 budget. Traditionally, debt financing in Malta has been regarded as more efficient from a tax perspective due to the deductibility against chargeable income of finance costs incurred by companies upon the granting of loans. The main objective of the rules is to approximate the manner in which cost of equity and cost of debt are treated from a tax perspective. The rules provide certain undertakings with the possibility of deducting interest they are deemed to have incurred on equity.

Effective from year of assessment 2018, companies and partnerships resident in Malta, or permanent establishments in Malta of a non-Maltese resident undertaking may elect to avail of the rules.

The notional interest deduction (NID) is calculated by multiplying:

a) The deemed NID, which is the risk-free rate set by reference to the current yield to maturity on Malta government stocks with a remaining term of approximately 20 years, plus a 5% premium; and

b) The risk capital of the undertaking at the end of the relevant financial year, which includes share/partnership capital, share premium, positive retained earnings, interest-free loans, any other reserves resulting from a contribution to the undertaking, and any other item that is shown as equity in the undertaking's financial statements.

The rules prescribe that shareholders or partners of an undertaking that has claimed NID will be deemed to have received an amount of income equal to the interest on risk capital from that undertaking. Where the undertaking has more than one shareholder or partner, each shareholder or partner will be deemed to have received an amount of deemed income that is proportionate to the nominal value of the risk capital pertaining to that particular shareholder or partner.

The maximum amount of NID that can be claimed in a financial year is set at 90% of the undertaking's chargeable income, although it will be possible for an undertaking to carry forward any excess. Any remaining chargeable income will be subject to Maltese income tax at the standard rates. Where a shareholder or partner of the undertaking is not resident in Malta, the deemed interest should be exempt from tax in Malta provided certain conditions are satisfied.

It is pertinent to note that dividend distributions made out of profits in respect of which the NID was availed will not be chargeable to any further tax at shareholder or partner level. Moreover, the rules also include anti-avoidance provisions in order to curb potential abuse use of the NID system.

Salomone
Vella-Donald

Mark Galea Salomone (mark.galeasalomone@camilleripreziosi.com) and Donald Vella (donald.vella@camilleripreziosi.com)

Camilleri Preziosi

Tel: +356 21238989

Website: www.camilleripreziosi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article