Switzerland: VAT rate reductions effective from 2018

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: VAT rate reductions effective from 2018

intl-updates-small.jpg

The Swiss population rejected the 2020 Old-Age and Survivors Insurance reform on September 24 2017. As a result, the additional funding of disability insurance (DI) by 0.4 points of VAT will expire at the end of 2017. However, the standard and special VAT rates will increase by 0.1 point from January 1 2018 due to the draft measures to finance and develop railway infrastructure.

Switzerland's current VAT rates will decrease from 8% to 7.7% (standard rate) and from 3.8% to 3.7% (special rate) on January 1 2018. The reduced rate of 2.5% will remain unchanged.

The Federal Tax Administration already published practical guidelines regarding the reductions (e.g. invoicing, down payments, leasing contracts, new net tax debt rates and flat rates). The guidelines also include the new VAT return forms that take both the current and new rates into account.

What does this mean for the VAT payer?

Any change in the VAT rates will require adaptation of invoicing and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, in particular:

  • Invoices, contracts, etc. will need to be amended to reflect the new rates as from January 1 2018;

  • Additional tax codes will have to be created in the ERP system to manage transactions under the current VAT rates and the new rates;

  • The tax point of transactions (i.e. the date of supply) will need to be carefully determined to determine the applicable VAT rate. This is especially important for continuous services, down payments and price adjustments/credit notes;

  • Account will need to be taken of specific rules that apply to certain sectors. For example, for hotels, the current special VAT rate will be applicable to accommodations and catering services provided on New Year's Eve, but a pro-rata rate will have to be used for arrangements concluded for the period straddling 2017 and 2018; and

  • The new VAT return form may require internal compliance teams to adapt their VAT compliance processes.

Businesses should review their positions as soon as possible to ensure they are prepared for the new rules.

suter.jpg

Benno Suter

 

dimitriou.jpg

Constant Dimitriou

Benno Suter (bsuter@deloitte.ch) and Constant Dimitriou (cdimitriou@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6366 and +41 58 279 8077

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR understands that UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves will announce a consultation on the proposed financial reward scheme, which had left advisers fretting
The long-running dispute centres on Medtronic’s use of the comparable uncontrolled transaction TP method; in other news, Paul Hastings and FTI Consulting both made double tax hires
The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Gift this article