Montenegro: Montenegro and US sign intergovernmental agreement to implement FATCA

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Montenegro: Montenegro and US sign intergovernmental agreement to implement FATCA

intl-updates-small.jpg
petrovic.jpg

Ivan Petrovic

Montenegro has shown its commitment to improving compliance with international tax standards. The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) agreement is yet another example of a set of steps taken towards broadening the cooperation between the US and Montenegro and following the international standards of cross-border tax assistance.

The US Ambassador Margaret Ann Uyehara and Montenegrin Minister of Finance Darko Radunovic, signed the intergovernmental agreement (IGA) on June 2 2017 to implement the FATCA provisions and to promote tax transparency between the two nations. The agreement underscores the continued cooperation and strong bilateral relationship between Montenegro and the US, as well as the growing international cooperation aimed at curbing tax evasion.

The agreement with the US on the implementation of FATCA regulations aims at preventing tax evasion by US citizens and related individuals holding accounts in Montenegrin banks. Montenegro, in accordance with the agreement, gathers information in relation such persons and automatically exchanges this information once a year with the US.

There are two potential models for such an exchange, as discussed below:

  • Ensuring all financial institutions register and conclude individual contracts with the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS);

  • Concluding a bilateral agreement between the Montenegrin government and the US government, with the possibility of choosing between two sub-modules: either all financial institutions will submit data to the competent authority of Montenegro which will the forward it to the IRS; or financial institutions shall submit data to the IRS on their own.

It was found that the first model would not be acceptable for Montenegro, due to the existence of a legal limitation for banks to submit confidential banking (Article 84 of the Law on Banks), i.e. banning the provision of information to third parties on transfers of funds to clients without their written consent. Therefore, the second model has been selected.

On the basis of the concluded agreement, Montenegro will now be obliged to collect information and to inform and exchange annually the name, address, and US public information bulletin of each designated person owning an account in reporting Montenegrin institutions.

Ivan Petrovic (ivan.petrovic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Montenegro

Tel: +382 20 228 490

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2026 showed why harmonisation remains elusive, advisers must raise their game, and ‘everyone’s data is rubbish’
The firm’s board has reportedly asked Kevin Burrowes to continue until 2028 as the KPMG Australia scandal raises expectations of regulatory reform
A former Deloitte partner will lead the firm’s latest geographic expansion; in other news, Baker McKenzie added six tax lawyers to its partnership
The Fair Tax Mark now extends to domestic-only companies with turnover above €1m, with Thai travel operator Tripseed the first to be certified
A technology provider had to be educated on technical requirements by Joseph Ribkoff’s IT team, a tax manager at the company said
But businesses should remain flexible when choosing between internal and external resources to handle added ViDA complexity, ITR’s Indirect Tax forum also heard
Non-compliance from small businesses continues to account for most of the gap, HM Revenue and Customs revealed
The new managing director of R&D tax relief consultancy ForrestBrown tells ITR about his priorities for the business, where he’s focusing his time and what makes tax cool
PwC Australia’s response to its tax leaks scandal could give KPMG a useful case study, but so far there’s little sign of positive lessons learned
Tom Goldstein’s attempt to overturn his tax conviction was shot down; in other news, Deloitte promoted several tax partners in Italy
Gift this article