Montenegro: Montenegro and US sign intergovernmental agreement to implement FATCA
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Montenegro: Montenegro and US sign intergovernmental agreement to implement FATCA

intl-updates-small.jpg
petrovic.jpg

Ivan Petrovic

Montenegro has shown its commitment to improving compliance with international tax standards. The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) agreement is yet another example of a set of steps taken towards broadening the cooperation between the US and Montenegro and following the international standards of cross-border tax assistance.

The US Ambassador Margaret Ann Uyehara and Montenegrin Minister of Finance Darko Radunovic, signed the intergovernmental agreement (IGA) on June 2 2017 to implement the FATCA provisions and to promote tax transparency between the two nations. The agreement underscores the continued cooperation and strong bilateral relationship between Montenegro and the US, as well as the growing international cooperation aimed at curbing tax evasion.

The agreement with the US on the implementation of FATCA regulations aims at preventing tax evasion by US citizens and related individuals holding accounts in Montenegrin banks. Montenegro, in accordance with the agreement, gathers information in relation such persons and automatically exchanges this information once a year with the US.

There are two potential models for such an exchange, as discussed below:

  • Ensuring all financial institutions register and conclude individual contracts with the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS);

  • Concluding a bilateral agreement between the Montenegrin government and the US government, with the possibility of choosing between two sub-modules: either all financial institutions will submit data to the competent authority of Montenegro which will the forward it to the IRS; or financial institutions shall submit data to the IRS on their own.

It was found that the first model would not be acceptable for Montenegro, due to the existence of a legal limitation for banks to submit confidential banking (Article 84 of the Law on Banks), i.e. banning the provision of information to third parties on transfers of funds to clients without their written consent. Therefore, the second model has been selected.

On the basis of the concluded agreement, Montenegro will now be obliged to collect information and to inform and exchange annually the name, address, and US public information bulletin of each designated person owning an account in reporting Montenegrin institutions.

Ivan Petrovic (ivan.petrovic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Montenegro

Tel: +382 20 228 490

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The firm’s new Asia-Pacific head James Badenach tells ITR that A&M Tax can provide an alternative in the region to a “constrained” ‘big four’
As the firm declined to speak with ITR over its progress, senator Deborah O’Neill branded PwC Australia’s recent parliamentary responses as ‘unsatisfactory’
A Swedish company’s CEO working part-time in Denmark led to a noteworthy PE decision; in other news, Latham & Watkins grew its London tax team
Rather than outright replace human intelligence, AI solutions can serve as the ‘infinite intern’ tax advisers need to automate onerous tasks, argues Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
The lack of provision for bilateral advance pricing agreements is a notable omission from proposed reforms of Brazil’s transfer pricing rules
Ursula von der Leyen is under pressure to ensure her new team makes competitiveness a top priority. How tax policy is designed and implemented is crucial, writes Ralph Cunningham
Speaking exclusively at ITR’s Transfer Pricing Forum in Europe, the Commission’s Marc Clercx also addressed industry concerns over the arm’s-length principle
After a protracted offensive from 10 Australian professional bodies, a Senate motion to strike out contentious new tax ethical rules has failed, but concessions were secured
The closely watched decision represents the final nail in the coffin for Apple and serves as a warning to other multinationals, experts have suggested
UK tax advisers have branded Reeves’ pledge to cap corporation tax at 25% as “a smart move” and “an easy give”
Gift this article