Montenegro: Montenegro and US sign intergovernmental agreement to implement FATCA

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Montenegro: Montenegro and US sign intergovernmental agreement to implement FATCA

intl-updates-small.jpg
petrovic.jpg

Ivan Petrovic

Montenegro has shown its commitment to improving compliance with international tax standards. The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) agreement is yet another example of a set of steps taken towards broadening the cooperation between the US and Montenegro and following the international standards of cross-border tax assistance.

The US Ambassador Margaret Ann Uyehara and Montenegrin Minister of Finance Darko Radunovic, signed the intergovernmental agreement (IGA) on June 2 2017 to implement the FATCA provisions and to promote tax transparency between the two nations. The agreement underscores the continued cooperation and strong bilateral relationship between Montenegro and the US, as well as the growing international cooperation aimed at curbing tax evasion.

The agreement with the US on the implementation of FATCA regulations aims at preventing tax evasion by US citizens and related individuals holding accounts in Montenegrin banks. Montenegro, in accordance with the agreement, gathers information in relation such persons and automatically exchanges this information once a year with the US.

There are two potential models for such an exchange, as discussed below:

  • Ensuring all financial institutions register and conclude individual contracts with the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS);

  • Concluding a bilateral agreement between the Montenegrin government and the US government, with the possibility of choosing between two sub-modules: either all financial institutions will submit data to the competent authority of Montenegro which will the forward it to the IRS; or financial institutions shall submit data to the IRS on their own.

It was found that the first model would not be acceptable for Montenegro, due to the existence of a legal limitation for banks to submit confidential banking (Article 84 of the Law on Banks), i.e. banning the provision of information to third parties on transfers of funds to clients without their written consent. Therefore, the second model has been selected.

On the basis of the concluded agreement, Montenegro will now be obliged to collect information and to inform and exchange annually the name, address, and US public information bulletin of each designated person owning an account in reporting Montenegrin institutions.

Ivan Petrovic (ivan.petrovic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Montenegro

Tel: +382 20 228 490

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Around 450 client-facing roles are due to be axed next week, it has been reported
The OECD may be making a mistake if a 2029 review is intended to outlast Trump in the hope of more favourable treatment from the US Democrats
Nexdigm has invested in Singapore-based infer360, a TP intelligence product designed by ex-PwC partners
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Americas Tax Awards
Despite initial hopes that the reporting obligation had been suspended, compliance challenges brought by Brazil’s indirect tax reform are very much a reality
As tax authorities embrace AI and governments weigh pillar two reforms, Latin America is developing a more connected and internationally focused tax agenda
Advisers with pre-existing corporation tax or self-assessment accounts must now register or risk enforcement action from HMRC
India's tax authorities are increasingly scrutinising the rationale behind cross-border structures
Sharmila Sanmugam's move from industry to WTS UK offers an early glimpse into how the fledgling firm hopes to compete with larger rivals
Historical claims involving KPMG Australia's tax practice have surfaced as the firm battles a separate parliamentary inquiry into its handling of whistleblowers
Gift this article