Switzerland: Swiss Tax Reform Proposal 17 on track as first round of hearings are completed

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss Tax Reform Proposal 17 on track as first round of hearings are completed

intl-updates-small.jpg
stocker.jpg
kistler.jpg

Raoul Stocker

Jacques Kistler

The Swiss Federal Department of Finance (SFDF) said on April 10 2017 that the designated Steering Committee of the Swiss Federation and the cantons has successfully concluded the first round of hearings with representatives of the Swiss business community, political parties, and the cities and municipalities, in regard to the so-called Tax Reform Proposal 17, which is replacing Corporate Tax Reform III that was rejected by the Swiss electorate in its proposed form.

Broad support for Tax Reform Proposal 17

Tax Reform Proposal 17 enjoys broad support among the various stakeholders. According to the SFDF, the hearings took place in an objective and constructive manner. The need for a comprehensive corporate tax reform is undisputed and there is common ground in regard to the objectives of the Tax Reform Proposal 17, namely to restore international acceptance of the Swiss corporate tax law and to maintain the attractiveness of Switzerland internationally as a business location, while at the same time securing adequate tax revenues at the federal, cantonal and communal levels.

Stakeholders aim for the reform to enter into force as soon as possible

According to the statement of the SFDF, the hearings confirmed the high expectations for Tax Reform Proposal 17. In the interest of legal certainty it is the clear desire of all stakeholders that the reform should enter into force as soon as possible. At its meeting on April 7 2017, the Steering Committee reaffirmed that the Swiss Federation and the cantons should ensure the greatest possible transparency in regard to the legislative process and the financial implications of the proposed tax reform and that cities and municipalities are to be closely involved in the process.

Next steps

The Steering Committee under the lead of the Swiss finance minister, which is tasked with submitting the tax reform proposal to the Swiss Federal Council, is evaluating the findings from the hearings and re-approaching the cities and municipalities in a second round of hearings. It is further expected that the Swiss Federal Council will then determine the basic parameters of the Swiss Tax Reform 17 and decide on the further procedure and timeline in the course of June 2017.

Raoul Stocker (rstocker@deloitte.ch) and Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6271 and +41 58 279 8164

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
While Brazil’s consumption tax overhaul led to a short-term spike in tax advisory demand, we are now in a period of ‘normalisation’ marked by decreased recruitment
The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
Gift this article