International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss CFOs want to see increased tax competition by the cantons


More than 100 chief financial officers (CFOs) in Switzerland have said they want to see a comprehensive solution be developed when preparing the new Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III).


Jackie Hess

Raoul Stocker

On February 12 2017, the Swiss electorate rejected CTR III in its proposed form. On the occasion of the quarterly CFO Survey of Deloitte, more than 100 chief financial officers (CFOs) in Switzerland were asked shortly after the vote what they now expect from a revised tax reform.

Although the content of the revised legislation is yet unknown, a new version of the reform will likely entail the undisputed elements of the rejected reform. More than 100 CFOs were questioned on their priorities as to which elements should be considered in the revised tax reform so that Switzerland remains, in their eyes, an attractive business location. The key findings were:

  • Of those surveyed, 87% of CFOs would like the law to grant the cantons extensive leeway for tax rate reductions;

  • Of those surveyed, 64% prefer to retain a generous tax deduction for research and development expenses. Moreover, 44% see the patent box regime as a suitable measure; and

  • The notional interest deduction was one of the most controversial measures of the rejected reform. Only 39% of the questioned CFOs see this as a suitable measure to be considered in a new law.

Swiss CFOs now expect political stakeholders to come up with a compatible solution and take the necessary time for it – irrespective of the EU/OECD deadline for abolishing the tax privileges of companies by 2019. The main findings were as follows:

  • Of those survey, 59% believe a legislative process in one piece to be launched as soon as possible is the most promising path. The new law should realistically come into force by 2020 or 2021;

  • Only about a third (30%) of respondents favour a two-step approach. The first step would abolish the tax privileges by 2019, combined with a solution for the transition, and the second step would present additional potential measures; and

  • The development of a completely new Swiss tax system (6%) or a "do-nothing" approach (6%) are basically not considered as an option.

The results show that Swiss CFOs are very much interested in an immediate and viable solution at the political level. However, rash decisions and interim solutions should be explicitly avoided. Rather, a comprehensive solution should be developed, which is well balanced and backed by the majority of stakeholders.

Jackie Hess ( and Raoul Stocker (


Tel: +41 58 279 6312 and +41 58 279 6271


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.