Spain: Spanish corporate income tax hike: New measures
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: Spanish corporate income tax hike: New measures

gallardo.jpg

Gonzalo Gallardo

At the end of 2016, a provision appeared in Royal Decree-law 3/2016 of December 3, introducing important changes to the Corporate Income Tax Law. Prior to that, Royal Decree-law 2/2016 of September 30 2016, had amended the prepayment system relating to this tax, establishing a minimum advance payment based on the income per books rather than the tax base. Both of those provisions are aimed at reducing the public deficit by immediately increasing the amount collected for corporate income tax, and mainly affect companies with high revenues and multinationals operating in Spain (large enterprises). In this commentary, we will highlight the three most relevant changes brought in by the new provision.

Firstly, for fiscal years starting on or after January 1 2016, regulations on the use of tax assets (tax losses and tax credits for the avoidance of national and international double taxation) have been made stricter for large enterprises by raising the percentage limits on the tax base and establishing new limits on tax payable.

Consequently, even where there are sufficient tax credits available, if the tax base is positive, the tax settlement will always result in an amount payable. In practice, this gives rise to a deferral in the use of those tax credits (as there is no deadline for using them) which, apart from the financial effect of bringing forward the payment of taxes, has an important accounting impact if the use of tax credits is delayed beyond the period accepted for their capitalisation for accounting purposes.

Secondly, for fiscal years starting on or after January 1 2017, taxpayers can no longer deduct the losses incurred on the transfer of holdings in companies that qualify for the exemption regime (qualifying holdings). That deduction is also not permitted in the case of foreign companies subject to low taxation, regardless of the percentage holding in their capital.

This is, in part, a consequence of the exemption method established some time ago for qualifying holdings in foreign companies and recently extended to Spanish companies. However, if the loss is incurred when the company is dissolved, it can be deducted, provided that it is not derived from a reorganisation operation or the company's activity continues. Thus, what this measure actually seeks is for the losses not to be recognised at the level of the shareholders during the lifetime of the company.

For holdings that do not meet these requirements (non-qualifying holdings in companies not located in low-taxation territories), the previous rules remain in force, so the losses continue to be deductible when the holdings are transferred to third parties or when the company is dissolved other than through a reorganisation operation covered by the tax neutrality regime.

Lastly, as from fiscal years starting on or after January 1 2016, all corporate income taxpayers are obliged to reverse on a straight-line basis over a period of five fiscal years, the impairment losses in respect of holdings in the capital of companies (resident in Spain or abroad) that have been deducted in past fiscal years (we remind you that taxpayers have not been permitted to deduct impairment losses on holdings since January 1 2013), without this being conditional on the recovery of the value of the investee. Thus, after the five-year period elapses, shareholders will not have deducted any impairment losses in respect of their holdings, and those losses will be tax deductible when the entity is transferred or dissolved according to the regime mentioned above.

Gonzalo Gallardo (gonzalo.gallardo@garrigues.com), Madrid

Garrigues

Tel: +34 915145200

Website: www.garrigues.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

However, making APAs harder to reach could ‘pose problems’ for UK businesses
Microsoft's director of benefits taxation tells ITR about having no normal days, family inspiration and what makes tax cool
The 61-year-old has run the firm’s UK business since 2020
The report, which again demanded PwC release more information related to the scandal, 'did not go far enough', Australian Greens Senator Barbara Pocock told ITR
Resources needed to manage new compliance and financial reporting requirements will be significant, BDO also said
Interested parties may submit their comments on proposed bills and the subsidiary legislation by July 5
The Australian government has run roughshod over professional tax bodies with untested reporting obligations to please a mob baying for PwC’s blood, writes Tom Ravlic
Technical excellence is paramount for clients looking to hire new advisers, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 corporate counsel
The EU nation currently has a headline rate of 25%; in other news, DLA Piper and RSM UK have strengthened their tax teams
Labour's plans for closing the tax gap suggest that taxpayers may face an increasingly aggressive HMRC
Gift this article