Poland: Poland overhauls structure of fiscal administration

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Poland overhauls structure of fiscal administration

sarna.jpg

Alicja Sarna

Fiscal administration in Poland will face major changes in its structure and organisation from March 1 when the new law on National Fiscal Administration enters into force.

The main objective of the new regulations is, as its justifications says, to reduce tax fraud, improve collectability of taxes and customs duties, reduce the costs of treasury administration with respect to the amount of government revenue obtained and adjust tax administration to the conditions of cooperation with the tax administration of EU member states.

Governmental tax and customs administration operate separately, and tax competencies are divided between the tax administration and fiscal control unit. From March 1 all these sections will become combined. The law will also limit the role of the finance minister with respect to taxes. His responsibilities will be taken over mostly by the chief of the new administration, i.e. the head of the National Fiscal Administration, who will perform the functions that are now carried out by the Head of the Customs Service, General Inspector of Treasury Control and General Inspector of Financial Information. Additionally, the Minister of Finance will issue general tax rulings (i.e. rulings not addressed to an individual taxpayer).

The newly established Director of the National Fiscal Information will take over responsibilities regarding, i.e. issuance of the individual tax rulings and processing reliable tax and customs information.

The head of the tax and customs office will perform a role similar to the directors of fiscal control offices and heads of customs offices, who are responsible for tax and customs control, as well as establishing and determining levies and placing goods under customs procedures.

The head of the tax office, just as before, will have the primary role in the collection of levies and enforcement of debts while the director of the fiscal administration chamber will supervise both authorities at the first instance.

The new law also provides for standardisation of tax proceedings, including:

  • Tax and customs control, which will replace fiscal control proceedings and will verify whether regulations are complied through an analysis of declared tax bases and the correctness of tax settlements – the decision issued as a result of such controls can be challenged by appealing to the same authority;

  • Audit and audit activities (so far carried out by treasury control institutions);

  • Official verifications (so far carried out by the customs services); and

  • Regulations concerning tax controls performed by the head of the tax office and tax proceedings will remain unchanged.

In certain situations, the National Fiscal Administration will be also responsible for investigating, preventing, detecting and prosecuting given crimes i.e. document fraud, intellectual fraud, using documents with false information and intellectual fraud; deceit; organised crime and participation in an organised criminal group.

Alicja Sarna (alicja.sarna@mddp.pl)

MDDP, Poland

Tel: +48 (22) 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
As multinationals embed tax technology into their TP functions, a new breed of systems – built on multi-model databases – is quietly transforming intercompany pricing logic
The president described it as ‘one of the most important cases in the history of our country’; in other news, Portugal established a VAT group regime
Gift this article