Switzerland: Beware of equity incentive reporting obligations in Switzerland

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Beware of equity incentive reporting obligations in Switzerland

intl-updates-small.jpg

Employers in Switzerland are required to provide details on employee equity incentive holdings in a statement included with the annual Swiss salary certificate.

These statements are known as 'equity annexes', and all companies awarding equity incentives to Swiss-based (resident or non-resident) employees must comply with this requirement. Equity annexes are not new, but the cantonal tax authorities throughout the country are becoming stricter when ensuring that equity incentive reporting is accurate. Failure to comply can be costly for employers, both from a reputational and a financial perspective.

Employee equity incentive reporting for internationally mobile employees can be challenging even for the best run payroll departments. Employers should be aware of the following.

Misreporting

Common equity incentive reporting mistakes include:

  • Failure to prepare annexes when no transaction has taken place;

  • Failure to include all required information in the reporting document; and

  • Reporting only the Swiss taxable portion of income in the salary certificate (the authorities require full reporting).

These mistakes can have an impact on the calculation of an employee's income tax liability.

Consequences of failure to comply

The requirement to prepare equity annexes has been in existence for five years as of January 2018. Certain tax authorities previously tolerated non-filers as long as equity income was reported in the salary certificate; however, this practice has shifted over the years and employers that fail to file correct annexes now face stiff penalties.

When inaccurate annexes are discovered for the tax period in progress, the Swiss tax authorities often also will audit prior years' reporting to check for similar mistakes. Switzerland's 10-year statute of limitations can make this exercise challenging for plan administrators and payroll departments.

Other business benefits

Aside from the compliance requirements, proper reporting of employee equity incentives has business benefits, such as:

  • It is an easy way to verify total equity income, which is helpful in cases of multiple exercises and vestings;

  • It clearly shows the allocation of foreign and Swiss-sourced equity income for purposes of reporting income in the salary certificate;

  • It provides a helpful overview for employees by showing the different sources of employment income for the relevant year, the income they can expect to realise in the following years and the vesting dates of the shares in their employee portfolio;

  • It enables employees to accurately report their equity income on the tax return; and

  • It provides useful information for human resources and global mobility teams with Swiss-based employees.

Comments

Employers should invest time in reviewing the requirements for employee equity incentive reporting. Once the obligations are well-understood, the process can be automated and administered by payroll generalists.

van-den-eeckhaut.jpg
schneider.jpg

Renaat

van den Eeckhaut

Anna

Schneider

Renaat van den Eeckhaut (rhvandeneeckhaut@deloitte.ch) and Anna Schneider (annasschneider@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6986 and +41 58 279 6112

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
The expansion introduces ‘business-level digital capabilities’ for tax professionals, the US tax agency said
As tax teams face pressure from complex rules and manual processes, adopting clear ownership, clean data and adaptable technology is essential, writes Russell Gammon, chief innovation officer at Tax Systems
Partners want to join Ryan because it’s a disruptor firm, truly global and less bureaucratic, Tom Shave told ITR
If Trump continues to poke the world’s ‘middle powers’ with a stick, he shouldn’t be surprised when they retaliate
Gift this article