Australia: MLI, hybrid mismatch, MITs and staple structures, cross-border financing and reduced company tax rate

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: MLI, hybrid mismatch, MITs and staple structures, cross-border financing and reduced company tax rate

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

In recent weeks, we have seen important Australian tax developments that are relevant to multinationals and inbound investments. With many initiatives taking effect as early as January 1 2019, multinationals should consider the potential impact on their inbound and outbound Australian investments.



Legislation enabling the OECD's Multilateral Instrument

On August 24 2018, Australia enacted legislation that allows the OECD's Multilateral Instrument (MLI) to have force of law in Australia.

The MLI will have effect once ratification and diplomatic procedures are completed by Australia and each treaty country partner.

The MLI would implement the OECD's BEPS Action Plan into Australia's double tax treaties, subject to specific reservations expressed by the Australian government (such as those on specific permanent establishment articles).

In effect, the enabling legislation means that Australia's double tax treaties could be amended effective from as early as January 1 2019 (for example, for certain withholding taxes), subject to the formal procedures being completed.

Legislation for hybrid mismatch rules

On August 24 2018, Australia enacted its hybrid mismatch rules.

The rules implement BEPS Action 2, subject to Australian specific amendments. Specifically:

  • The rules apply to mismatches in Australian and foreign tax outcomes arising from a hybrid financial instrument, a hybrid payer, a reverse hybrid, a branch hybrid, a deducting hybrid an imported hybrid; and

  • In addition, the rules include a targeted integrity rule, which aims to prevent multinationals from bypassing the hybrid mismatch rules by using interposed country conduit type vehicles.

The rules will apply to income years starting on or after January 1 2019.

Managed investment trusts and stapled structures – integrity measures

On August 7 2018, the Australian government released further exposure draft legislation and explanatory materials affecting managed investment trusts (MITs) and stapled structures.

The further exposure draft legislation imposes a non-arm's length income rule and a statutory cap, which could apply to some cross-staple payments during the seven or 15-year transitional period in which a structure qualifies for the 15% concessional MIT withholding tax rate.

Cross-border financing

On August 1 2018, the Australian government and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) released a number of materials relevant to cross-border financing:

  • Draft legislation and draft taxation determination TD 2018/D4, which in effect would require entities to value its assets and debt capital with their accounting values, for the purposes of Australia's thin capitalisation rules;

  • Draft legislation, which is intended to ensure that foreign controlled Australian consolidated entities and groups with foreign operations to be treated as both outward and inward investing entities, for the purposes of the thin capitalisation rules;

  • Draft taxation determination TD 2018/D5, which identifies the types of costs which are debt deductions that are subject to Australia's thin capitalisation rules; and

  • Updated practical compliance guideline PCG 2017/4 (the ATO's tax compliance guidelines on cross-border financing), which has been updated to include a draft schedule to set out specific risk indicators for related-party derivative arrangements that are used to hedge or manage the economic exposure of a company or group of companies.

New tests for reduced company tax rate

On August 31 2018, Australia enacted legislation that amends the qualifying rules for the reduced company tax rate.

In effect, a corporate tax entity will qualify for the lower company tax rate of 27.5% (rather than 30%) for an income year if:

  • No more than 80% of its assessable income for that income year is passive income; and

  • The aggregated turnover – of the corporate tax entity, its affiliates and its connected entities – is less than the aggregated turnover threshold (A$50 million for the 2018-19 income year) for that income year.

These changes apply from the 2017-2018 income year.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article