International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: REITs investing offshore

Sponsored by

AdobeStock_255945432_real estate

The use of real estate investment trusts (REITs) is becoming increasingly popular in South Africa. However, care needs to be taken where a South African REIT holds various foreign property owning subsidiaries either directly or through a non-South African intermediary holding company (IHC).

The REIT regime in South Africa aims to create a 'flow though' vehicle for income tax purposes. A fundamental part of the regime relates to the ability of the REIT and its subsidiaries to deduct for income tax purposes, dividends declared and paid to their immediate shareholder/s. In order to be tax deductible, any such dividend must meet the criteria for a 'qualifying distribution' as defined.

A dividend will be deemed a qualifying distribution as long as 75% or more of the gross income of the REIT (or 'controlled company' paying the dividend) was attributable to 'rental income' in the preceding year of assessment. Rental income itself includes qualifying distributions derived from a controlled company.

A qualifying distribution, however, can only arise if a dividend is paid or is payable. Under the South African Income Tax Act, a dividend, as defined, can only be paid by a resident. Distributions made by non-residents are defined as 'foreign dividends'.

Consequently, a foreign dividend paid to a South African REIT by a subsidiary cannot constitute a qualifying distribution, with the result that the receipt of this amount in the hands of the REIT will not constitute rental income and will not help the REIT to meet the criteria required for its own distributions to be tax deductible.

This is severely prejudicial to shareholders in a REIT who invest on the basis of the tax flow through treatment. Until this issue in the law is resolved, South Africa REITs which expand offshore need to carefully monitor the extent to which the receipt of dividends from foreign subsidiaries (even if fully funded from income derived by those companies from immovable property) will dilute their own rental income. Oddly enough, a foreign dividend received by a REIT from a so-called 'property company' is included in rental income. (A property company is a company other than a subsidiary in which a REIT holds at least 20% of the equity, and at least 80% of the assets of which are attributable to immovable property.)

Treatment of a foreign dividend paid by a controlled company to a REIT

A foreign dividend declared by a foreign controlled company to a South African tax resident REIT may be fully or partially exempt under the provisions of Section 10B of the Act.

As long as the foreign company paying the dividend to the REIT cannot deduct that dividend from its own taxable income and the REIT holds at least 10% of the total equity shares and voting rights in that foreign company, the dividend from the foreign company will be fully tax exempt.

Where the 10% threshold is not met (or the dividend is deductible for the payer) a partial exemption is allowed for the foreign dividend, bringing the effective South African tax rate on the dividend to 20%.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The winners of the ITR Europe, Middle East, and Africa Tax Awards 2023 have been announced!
The winners of the ITR Asia-Pacific Tax Awards 2023 have been announced!
Mauro Faggion appeared cautiously optimistic as the European Commission waits to see whether all 27 member states will accept its proposal.
The global minimum rate also won’t entirely stop a race to the bottom, according to a tax director speaking at an ITR conference in London.
The country’s tax authorities are not interested in seeing transfer pricing studies any more, it was claimed at an ITR industry conference in London.
The controversial measure is being watered down after criticism from the European Central Bank.
More than 600 such requests were made in 2022, while HMRC has also bolstered its fraud service, it has been revealed.
The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.