Albania: Income tax implications following changes to gambling laws

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Albania: Income tax implications following changes to gambling laws

Sponsored by

Eurofast Albania
intl-updates-small.jpg

The Albanian government approved a series of changes to gambling laws on October 25 2018, which are effective from January 1 2019. This will have wide-reaching effects considering the gambling industry is the second largest employer in Albania after the energy sector.

Sports betting and slot machines will be closed from December 31 2018, and will only be available online. The only gambling activities that will be allowed to continue operations will be gambling at casino resorts and large hotels in residential areas, playing bingo games on television, and the national lottery.

Furthermore, details regarding the suspension of the Albanian Gambling Supervisory Authority (GSA) has been published, due to its restructuring.

Most importantly, the new gambling law will affect income tax revenues as well as employment. The government considers these effects irrelevant when compared to the negative social effect of gambling and the high risks associated with money laundering.

The gambling industry's turnover in 2018 was around €130 million ($147.3 million), an amount which should be taken with a grain of salt as the GSA estimates that the declared income from this sector is less than a half, with the other part remaining unofficial. The effect in state income would be a decrease in the revenue from tax on gambling of around €40 million.

Sports betting has become an undisputable social phenomenon in recent years. It is estimated that Albania – a country of 2.8 million people – is currently home to more than 4,000 sports betting locations all over the republic. The spread of the gambling industry has caused concern about its impact on low-income families.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
The expansion introduces ‘business-level digital capabilities’ for tax professionals, the US tax agency said
As tax teams face pressure from complex rules and manual processes, adopting clear ownership, clean data and adaptable technology is essential, writes Russell Gammon, chief innovation officer at Tax Systems
Partners want to join Ryan because it’s a disruptor firm, truly global and less bureaucratic, Tom Shave told ITR
If Trump continues to poke the world’s ‘middle powers’ with a stick, he shouldn’t be surprised when they retaliate
Gift this article