Albania: Income tax implications following changes to gambling laws

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Albania: Income tax implications following changes to gambling laws

Sponsored by

Eurofast Albania
intl-updates-small.jpg

The Albanian government approved a series of changes to gambling laws on October 25 2018, which are effective from January 1 2019. This will have wide-reaching effects considering the gambling industry is the second largest employer in Albania after the energy sector.

Sports betting and slot machines will be closed from December 31 2018, and will only be available online. The only gambling activities that will be allowed to continue operations will be gambling at casino resorts and large hotels in residential areas, playing bingo games on television, and the national lottery.

Furthermore, details regarding the suspension of the Albanian Gambling Supervisory Authority (GSA) has been published, due to its restructuring.

Most importantly, the new gambling law will affect income tax revenues as well as employment. The government considers these effects irrelevant when compared to the negative social effect of gambling and the high risks associated with money laundering.

The gambling industry's turnover in 2018 was around €130 million ($147.3 million), an amount which should be taken with a grain of salt as the GSA estimates that the declared income from this sector is less than a half, with the other part remaining unofficial. The effect in state income would be a decrease in the revenue from tax on gambling of around €40 million.

Sports betting has become an undisputable social phenomenon in recent years. It is estimated that Albania – a country of 2.8 million people – is currently home to more than 4,000 sports betting locations all over the republic. The spread of the gambling industry has caused concern about its impact on low-income families.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
Gift this article