Bulgaria: Bulgaria’s new AML measures still require urgent action by companies

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bulgaria: Bulgaria’s new AML measures still require urgent action by companies

Sponsored by

Eurofast Bulgaria
intl-updates-small.jpg

In March 2018, the fourth EU Money Laundering Directive was implemented. Known as MLD4, the Directive came into force in June 2018, and saw Bulgaria adopt new anti-money laundering measures.

Among the main innovations in MLD4 and the Bulgarian AML Act is the obligation to collect and file information on the ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs) of companies, and any other entities that directly or indirectly control them.

For that purpose, all EU member states must organise central databases (registers) where they will maintain information on UBOs of all corporations, including trust ventures of UK and/or US origin. Once set-up, central registers will considerably increase the quality of the available data for identification of the beneficial owners and therefore also meet the demand of the Financial Action Task Force (Groupe d'action Financiere) for stronger transparency when it comes to the identity of the UBOs.

As a result, businesses operating in Bulgaria need to identify and provide such information, while international businesses must appoint local contact persons for that purpose.

Entities that do not have at least one legal representative with a registered permanent residence in Bulgaria are obliged to appoint one. Failure to comply with such legal obligations would lead to financial sanctions for the appointed contact person.

It should be noted that the UBO's details are very likely to be required by banks, notaries, lawyers and other "obliged entities". The information should be entered in the Commercial Register and Register for Non-Profit Legal Entities (or the BULSTAT Register) by February 1 2019.

Declarations in these registers will be made through a designated application form, with the official supporting documentation attached. The final form is yet to be approved by the Ministry Council, along with the new rules for implementation of the Act. The New Rules for the Implementation of the Act will enter into force shortly after, thus launching the UBO disclosure procedures.

Compliance requirements

To ensure compliance, companies must carefully consider whether they are subject to the newly introduced requirements. This means that they should:

  • Disclose the ID of the UBO and the entities that directly or indirectly control it; and/or

  • Appoint and register a contact person (with registered permanent residence in Bulgaria, or a Bulgarian citizen).

Concept of a beneficial owner

Another important issue for consideration is the meaning of the term "beneficial owner" in the Act and the Directive. As for the term "control", the Act refers to the interpretation of the term in the Commercial Act.

An equally important consideration is when the beneficial owner cannot be identified, or if the person declared and identified is not the beneficial owner. In such cases, the individual who acts as a senior managing officer in the respective company will be considered the beneficial owner.

Penalties

Non-compliance with these obligations within the announced deadline may lead to penalties ranging from BGN 500-5,000 ($290-$2,900) for individuals, and BGN 1,000-10,000 for legal entities. The penalties are to be applied monthly until the requested information is duly registered.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
Gift this article