International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bulgaria: Bulgaria’s new AML measures still require urgent action by companies

Sponsored by

Eurofast Bulgaria

In March 2018, the fourth EU Money Laundering Directive was implemented. Known as MLD4, the Directive came into force in June 2018, and saw Bulgaria adopt new anti-money laundering measures.

Among the main innovations in MLD4 and the Bulgarian AML Act is the obligation to collect and file information on the ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs) of companies, and any other entities that directly or indirectly control them.

For that purpose, all EU member states must organise central databases (registers) where they will maintain information on UBOs of all corporations, including trust ventures of UK and/or US origin. Once set-up, central registers will considerably increase the quality of the available data for identification of the beneficial owners and therefore also meet the demand of the Financial Action Task Force (Groupe d'action Financiere) for stronger transparency when it comes to the identity of the UBOs.

As a result, businesses operating in Bulgaria need to identify and provide such information, while international businesses must appoint local contact persons for that purpose.

Entities that do not have at least one legal representative with a registered permanent residence in Bulgaria are obliged to appoint one. Failure to comply with such legal obligations would lead to financial sanctions for the appointed contact person.

It should be noted that the UBO's details are very likely to be required by banks, notaries, lawyers and other "obliged entities". The information should be entered in the Commercial Register and Register for Non-Profit Legal Entities (or the BULSTAT Register) by February 1 2019.

Declarations in these registers will be made through a designated application form, with the official supporting documentation attached. The final form is yet to be approved by the Ministry Council, along with the new rules for implementation of the Act. The New Rules for the Implementation of the Act will enter into force shortly after, thus launching the UBO disclosure procedures.

Compliance requirements

To ensure compliance, companies must carefully consider whether they are subject to the newly introduced requirements. This means that they should:

  • Disclose the ID of the UBO and the entities that directly or indirectly control it; and/or

  • Appoint and register a contact person (with registered permanent residence in Bulgaria, or a Bulgarian citizen).

Concept of a beneficial owner

Another important issue for consideration is the meaning of the term "beneficial owner" in the Act and the Directive. As for the term "control", the Act refers to the interpretation of the term in the Commercial Act.

An equally important consideration is when the beneficial owner cannot be identified, or if the person declared and identified is not the beneficial owner. In such cases, the individual who acts as a senior managing officer in the respective company will be considered the beneficial owner.


Non-compliance with these obligations within the announced deadline may lead to penalties ranging from BGN 500-5,000 ($290-$2,900) for individuals, and BGN 1,000-10,000 for legal entities. The penalties are to be applied monthly until the requested information is duly registered.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.