The effects and opportunities of ending a business in Chile

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The effects and opportunities of ending a business in Chile

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
Chilean tax legislation has been subject to important changes during the last tax reforms

Gregorio Martinez and Fernando Binder of PwC Chile explore the development and advantages of Chile’s unique end of business tax.

A topic which businesses sometimes forget to analyse when investing in a country are the tax effects associated with closing a business. In Chile, this is a relevant matter given that: (i) taxes are due, (ii) there are advantages to be had, and, (iii) businesses may no longer be left dormant postponing the end of business tax.

In light of this, Chilean tax legislation has been subject to important changes during the last tax reforms, which has generated different tax effects to those which had previously been produced.




When a business is closed, a 35% rate end of business tax is due. This tax is a replacement of final taxes (additional tax or global complementary tax) which would levy any profit distribution.



The end of business tax is determined through a formula that considers the tax equity less profits not subject to taxes less capital contributions. This means that it will not only levy taxable profits, but it may also levy financial profits.



There is a credit to be had for the corporate income tax paid by the entity, which may amount up to 27%. The amounts levied with end of business tax are not subject to any other income tax.



Following the above, the end of business tax may be compared with the taxation of profit distributions, if all assets were distributed, but here lays the major difference and opportunity. 



An asset distribution is considered to be an alienation; thus, it needs to be performed at fair market value triggering a corresponding capital gain based in the difference between the tax basis and the fair market value. In the case of end of business, by express disposition of the law, assets are to be assigned to the shareholders at tax basis.



This means that assets may be transferred to the shareholders, local or foreign, at tax basis without triggering any capital gain, disregarding any possible differences between fair market value and tax basis. 



In addition to the above, dormant entities are no longer a viable option in Chile, since the Chilean Internal Revenue Service has, for some time already, had the faculty to close a dormant business and apply the corresponding taxes.



Then, end of business may trigger tax payments, but it also represents a moment of opportunities, that although we are of the opinion that should be considered before performing an investment, it is never too late to review and prepare as a way out of a business.

The ability to transfer the assets at tax basis positions the end of business tax as a relevant alternative compared to profit distributions or sale of the entity/assets, where an analysis of each case would be required to determine the most convenient alternative.

A topic which businesses sometimes forget to analyse when investing in a country are the tax effects associated with closing a business. In Chile, this is a relevant matter given that: (i) taxes are due, (ii) there are advantages to be had, and, (iii) businesses may no longer be left dormant postponing the end of business tax.

In light of this, Chilean tax legislation has been subject to important changes during the last tax reforms, which has generated different tax effects to those which had previously been produced.




When a business is closed, a 35% rate end of business tax is due. This tax is a replacement of final taxes (additional tax or global complementary tax) which would levy any profit distribution.



The end of business tax is determined through a formula that considers the tax equity less profits not subject to taxes less capital contributions. This means that it will not only levy taxable profits, but it may also levy financial profits.



There is a credit to be had for the corporate income tax paid by the entity, which may amount up to 27%. The amounts levied with end of business tax are not subject to any other income tax.



Following the above, the end of business tax may be compared with the taxation of profit distributions, if all assets were distributed, but here lays the major difference and opportunity. 



An asset distribution is considered to be an alienation; thus, it needs to be performed at fair market value triggering a corresponding capital gain based in the difference between the tax basis and the fair market value. In the case of end of business, by express disposition of the law, assets are to be assigned to the shareholders at tax basis.



This means that assets may be transferred to the shareholders, local or foreign, at tax basis without triggering any capital gain, disregarding any possible differences between fair market value and tax basis. 



In addition to the above, dormant entities are no longer a viable option in Chile, since the Chilean Internal Revenue Service has, for some time already, had the faculty to close a dormant business and apply the corresponding taxes.



Then, end of business may trigger tax payments, but it also represents a moment of opportunities, that although we are of the opinion that should be considered before performing an investment, it is never too late to review and prepare as a way out of a business.

The ability to transfer the assets at tax basis positions the end of business tax as a relevant alternative compared to profit distributions or sale of the entity/assets, where an analysis of each case would be required to determine the most convenient alternative.

PwC Chile

T: +56 2 29400633

Fernando Binder: fernando.binder@cl.pwc.com

Gregorio Martinez: gregorio.martinez@cl.pwc.com 



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
Gift this article