US Outbound: Fiscal Cliff Bill extends key international tax provisions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Outbound: Fiscal Cliff Bill extends key international tax provisions

foley.jpg

mcgrew.jpg

Sean Foley


Landon McGrew

On January 2 2013, President Obama signed into law the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, averting tax elements of the fiscal cliff. In addition to permanently extending the Bush-era tax cuts for individuals with income of less than $400,000 and joint filers with income of less than $450,000, the legislation also temporarily extended two key international tax provisions. These international tax extenders provide important exceptions to the current taxation of a foreign subsidiary's earnings under the subpart F rules.

Subpart F income

In general, US multinationals are not subjected to US tax on the earnings of their foreign subsidiaries until those earnings are repatriated to the US. However, there are certain types of income, such as interest, dividends, rents, and royalties, that are subject to current taxation in the US when earned by a foreign subsidiary under the subpart F rules found in sections 951 through 964 of the Internal Revenue Code. There are a number of exceptions to current taxation under the subpart F rules, including the controlled foreign company (CFC) look-through rule of section 954(c)(6) and the active financing exception of section 954(h). These two exceptions had expired at the end of 2011.

The fiscal cliff extenders

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 retroactively to January 1 2012 extended the CFC look-through rule of section 954(c)(6) and the active financing exception of section 954(h) to December 31 2013 for calendar year taxpayers. Without these extensions, US multinationals would have been subject to US tax on these types of subpart F income during the 2012 taxable year. A brief description of these two international tax extenders is included below.

Under the CFC look-through rule of section 954(c)(6), dividends, interest, rents, and royalties received by a CFC from another CFC that is a related person (as defined in section 954(d)(3)) are generally excluded from the definition of subpart F income to the extent allocable to income of the related CFC that is not subpart F income. The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) has estimated that the two-year extension of the CFC look-through rule will cost approximately $1.5 billion over 10 years.

Under the active financing exception of section 954(h), income earned by a foreign subsidiary that is derived from the active conduct of a banking, financing, or similar business is generally excluded from the definition of subpart F income. The JCT has estimated that the extension of the active financing exception will cost approximately $11.2 billion over 10 years.

In light of the extension of these rules, US multinationals should consider revisiting situations where planning may have been deferred or postponed because of the uncertainty of whether these provisions would be further extended. Moreover, given the retroactivity of the legislation, and the fact that the legislation was enacted in January 2013 (and not by the end of 2012), multinationals should also consider its impact on financial accounting.

The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser.

This article represents the views of the authors only, and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Sean Foley (sffoley@kpmg.com) and Landon McGrew (lmcgrew@kpmg.com), Washington DC

KPMG

Tel: +1 202 533 5588

Fax: +1 202 315 3087

Website: www.us.kpmg.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
Gift this article