India: Rules for application of general-anti avoidance rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India: Rules for application of general-anti avoidance rules

nayak.jpg

jain.jpg

Rajendra Nayak


Aastha Jain

A General anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) was introduced in the Indian Tax Law (ITL) in 2012 as a broad-based rule giving wide discretionary powers to Indian revenue authorities to invalidate an arrangement, including disregarding application of tax treaties, if an arrangement is treated as an "impermissible avoidance arrangement". GAAR would come in effect from tax year 2015-16. The Central Board of Direct Taxes, the apex administrative authority of direct taxes in India, has recently issued a notification prescribing rules for the application of GAAR. The rules clarify that GAAR would apply to all tax benefits obtained after April 1 2015. However, it also provides certain exemptions where GAAR would not apply which are as below:

  • An arrangement where the aggregate tax benefit of all the parties to the arrangement in the relevant tax year does not exceed INR30 million ($487,770).

  • A foreign institutional investor (FII) who has not taken any benefit under a tax treaty entered into by India with another country or a specified territory and has invested in listed or unlisted securities with prior permission of the competent authority in accordance with Indian regulatory laws.

  • A non-resident investor who has invested in an FII directly or indirectly by way of an offshore derivative instrument or otherwise.

  • Any income derived from transfer of an investment made before August 30 2010 (the date of introduction of the Direct Tax Code Bill 2010) by such person.

The rules also state that where a part of an arrangement is declared as impermissible, GAAR provisions would apply only in relation to such part and not to the entire arrangement. Further, procedure for invoking GAAR by the Indian revenue authorities is laid out which includes a window for taxpayers to raise objections against invocation of GAAR at different levels during the proceedings. Other aspects like mode, form, manner and time limit for the various steps involved in the procedure are prescribed.

Introduction of GAAR had raised significant apprehensions with the stakeholders/investors followed by representations and expert committee recommendations on various aspects of GAAR. In view of the above, certain amendments were recently carried out in GAAR under the ITL. In the same spirit, the rules appear to address concerns of taxpayers to a large extent and provide clarity on the procedural aspects for application of GAAR. The rules will be effective from tax year 2015-16.

Rajendra Nayak (rajendra.nayak@in.ey.com) and Aastha Jain (aastha.jain@in.ey.com)

EY

Tel: +91 80 4027 5275

Website: www.ey.com/india

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article