Switzerland: Swiss cantons announce lower headline tax rates in anticipation of Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss cantons announce lower headline tax rates in anticipation of Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III

hess.jpg

kistler.jpg

Jackie Hess


Jacques Kistler

Switzerland is contemplating a comprehensive corporate tax reform – Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III – which would phase out certain tax regimes, such as the holding, mixed and domiciliary company regimes in the 2018 – 2020 timeframe and replace these regimes with a variety of other measures. The overriding objective of this comprehensive tax reform is to secure and strengthen the tax competitiveness and attractiveness of Switzerland as an international location for corporations.

Several measures to replace the holding, mixed and domiciliary company regimes that would accomplish the dual goals of tax competitiveness and international acceptance are being considered, in particular:

  • A licence box for income arising from the exploitation and use of intellectual property;

  • A notional interest deduction on equity; and

  • A general reduction of the headline corporate tax rate (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal rate).

Twelve Swiss cantons are now considering a reduction of their headline tax rate (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal rate). The following cantons already announced a reduction of their headline corporate tax rates: Vaud to 13.8%, Geneva to 13%, Neuchâtel to 15.6%, Fribourg to 15%, and Zug to approximately 12%.

In addition, the following cantons in Switzerland with a tax rate that already stands below 15% have stated they will, or are expected to, keep their low tax rates: Schwyz: 11.7 % (communities of Freienbach/Wollerau), Lucerne: 12.3% (11.3% in the lowest taxed community), Appenzell Ausserrhoden: 12.7%, Nidwalden: 12.7%, Obwalden: 12.7%, and Appenzell Innerrhoden: 14.3%.

As indicated above, the lowering of the headline tax rate is just one of several measures that are being contemplated to ensure the competitiveness and attractiveness of Switzerland for corporations once certain special tax regimes phase out in the 2018 to 2020 timeframe.

Jackie Hess (jahess@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6312

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 8164

René Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6359

Deloitte

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
Gift this article