India: India-Mauritius treaty renegotiations continue

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India: India-Mauritius treaty renegotiations continue

Sponsored by

logo.png
The new reporting obligation seeks to prevent aggressive tax planning

Under Indian law, capital gains on the transfer of shares of an Indian company are taxable in India. However, under a few treaties, including Mauritius, the right to tax such gains has been ceded by India in favour of the seller's country of residence.

dharawat.jpg

gangadharan.jpg

Rakesh Dharawat


Hariharan Gangadharan

Under Indian law, capital gains on the transfer of shares of an Indian company are taxable in India. However, under a few treaties, including Mauritius, the right to tax such gains has been ceded by India in favour of the seller's country of residence. As a result of this favourable provision, Mauritius has been one of the largest sources of foreign investment into India. However, in Indian policy circles, there has been widespread concern over abuse of the India-Mauritius treaty and efforts have been underway to renegotiate its terms for some time, particularly in connection with the availability of the capital gains exemption. A joint working group was constituted to examine and arrive at a mutually acceptable solution that addressed the concerns of both countries.

It has long been speculated that the re-negotiation of the capital gains exemption under the India-Mauritius treaty would result in the introduction of a limitation on benefits (LoB) article, akin to what is provided for under the India-Singapore treaty (which, inter alia, requires a minimum expenditure in Singapore of S$ 200,000 ($140,000) to be eligible to claim the benefit of the capital gain exemption under the treaty). However, recent reports suggest that the treaty renegotiations may result in a complete elimination of the capital gains exemption itself.

While there is no official announcement of the outcome of the negotiations between the two countries, reports suggest that there are three significant changes to the treaty that are on the anvil.

  • The first and most important change relates to the continued availability of the capital gains tax exemption under the treaty. It is reported that from April 1 2017, India will no longer exempt capital gains arising to a resident of Mauritius.

  • The second relates to the introduction of a LoB article, which inter alia contemplates that companies in Mauritius will incur annual administrative expenses of at least Rs1.5 million ($23,000).

  • Lastly, it is proposed that India will have the right to tax interest up to a rate of 7.5%.

While official confirmation and a formal notification are awaited, these changes, if enacted, will significantly alter the tax landscape for inbound investments into India.

Minimum alternate tax (MAT) on foreign companies

The applicability of MAT based on book profits to foreign companies has been the subject of some controversy in India in recent times. While an amendment to the law was made as part of this year's Budget, the issue nonetheless remains relevant for past years and was scheduled to be argued before the Supreme Court in August 2015.

An expert committee was appointed by the Indian Government under the chairmanship of a retired judge, AP Shah, to examine this issue, particularly in the context of foreign institutional investors in India's stock markets. The committee's findings are expected to have a significant bearing on this controversy. The committee, after extensive consultations with stakeholders, including taxpayers and industry bodies, has submitted its report to the government. While the report has not been made public, the government has announced that it would take a final decision on the matter shortly. In the meantime, the hearing before the Supreme Court on this issue has been deferred to late September to enable the government to examine the AP Shah committee's recommendations.

Rakesh Dharawat (rakesh.dharawat@dhruvaadvisors.com) andHariharan Gangadharan (hariharan.gangadharan@dhruvaadvisors.com)

Dhruva Advisors

Tel: +91 2261081000

Website: www.dhruvaadvisors.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Foreign remittance requirements put additional administrative burden on Indian law firms and strain their relationship with foreign associate firms, according to practitioners
Gift this article