EU: June ECOFIN Council debates mandatory AEoI, tax rulings and Interest & Royalties Directive

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU: June ECOFIN Council debates mandatory AEoI, tax rulings and Interest & Royalties Directive

van-der-made.jpg

Bob van der Made

Proposal for mandatory automatic exchange of information (AEoI) with regard to tax rulings (DAC3)

Selected issues discussed:

  • The scope and timing of information to be exchanged, and further alignment with work carried out by the OECD;

  • The exemption of bilateral and multilateral advance pricing agreements (APAs) with third countries; and

  • The European Commission's role in the new mechanism with regard to DAC3, since the Commission is not a competent tax authority.

A number of finance ministers intervened in the ECOFIN public session: France, Germany, Ireland, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK. Most member states came out publicly in favour of the proposal, even though Council working group negotiations on the proposal apparently made very little progress in July.

Luxemburg said during the ECOFIN debate that it is an absolute priority for the Luxembourg EU Council presidency to adopt this proposal before the end of its presidency term (December 31 2015).

Interest & Royalties Directive Recast Proposal

To make progress on this 2011 Recast Proposal, the six-monthly rotating Latvian EU Council Presidency (January 1 2015 – June 30 2015) proposed to split up the Commission proposal in order to focus first on incorporating a GAAR clause, similar to the one added in January 2015 to the EU's Parent-Subsidiary Directive (that is, acting as a de minimis rule), while Council work would continue, in the meantime, on other remaining elements of the Directive, including:

  • a minimum effective level of taxation (not foreseen in the Commission's original proposal);and

  • a requirement for member states to inform each other in the event of the GAAR being invoked.

The Latvian presidency suggested that the above elements should be dealt with as part of the Recast Proposal, but it found no real traction on this during the ECOFIN meeting. Germany, France, Austria, Czech Republic, Greece and Italy insisted during the meeting that discussions in the Council should continue on the Interest & Royalties Directive Recast Proposal as a whole.

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com)

PwC Brussels

Tel: +31 88 792 3696

Website: www.pwc.com/eudtg

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax auditors themselves had not been aware of the new TP ‘transaction matrix’ requirements, ITR hears as five German partners share their client experiences
Its features include a built-in AI assistant as well as expert insights and commentary from Deloitte specialists
AI is rapidly finding its way into tax advisory services. But how can AI be deployed responsibly, reliably, and in compliance with legal standards?
Specified taxpayers will have to apply a 19% VAT rate on services offered by third parties through their platforms; in other news, Donald Trump imposed 30% South African tariffs
A ‘quiet revolution’ in HMRC’s compliance strategy has caused Adam Craggs to rethink how to advise clients, he tells ITR
If the Reform leader becomes UK prime minister then he may follow the direction of the US in at least one significant way
Trump declared a new national emergency in issuing the order; in other news, Grant Thornton Germany is up for sale and the subject of interest from both its UK and US counterparts
The judgment, which saw Denmark's Supreme Court rely on OECD TP guidance, sets aside more than 15 years of consistent administrative practice, experts have told ITR
Belgium’s new coalition government has gone ahead with a new exit tax regime that could land it in the courts
Brazil’s government has not officially framed the bill as a countermeasure amid trade tensions with the US, but the move is being considered as part of Brazil’s strategic response, one expert tells ITR
Gift this article