US Inbound: Obama Budget proposals: Tax corporate distributions as dividends

US Inbound: Obama Budget proposals: Tax corporate distributions as dividends

fuller.jpg

forst.jpg

Jim Fuller


David Forst

We discussed some of the new Obama Budget proposals last month. The Budget also has a category of proposed changes entitled 'tax corporate distributions as dividends'. These proposals are not targeted solely at international transactions, but can be important internationally. We will discuss two. Unless or until these proposals become law, they may present planning opportunities. One of these proposals focuses on a planning opportunity to permit corporate distributions to be tax-free to the company's shareholders. The plan involves having the corporation distribute stock in a subsidiary or subsidiaries having a high basis but minimal value. The goal is to reduce earnings and profits before making a large distribution to shareholders in the subsequent tax year.

Assume, for example, a foreign-owned US corporation (P) owns all of the common and preferred stock of a US subsidiary (S). P has $1 billion in accumulated earnings and profits. The preferred stock has a value of $10 million, but a basis of $1 billion because of previous dividend-equivalent redemptions in which P received $990 million in cash. Under current law, if an actual or deemed redemption of stock is treated as equivalent to a dividend, the shareholder's basis in any remaining shares of the corporation is increased by the shareholder's basis in the redeemed stock. Thus, the remaining preferred stock has a high basis, even though it has a low value.

If P distributes its $10 million of S preferred stock to its foreign shareholder, P would permanently eliminate any earnings and profits equal to the adjusted basis of the distributed stock ($1 billion). In the following year, P could distribute its accumulated cash of $990 million to its foreign shareholder and avoid dividend characterisation, and any resulting US withholding tax.

Under the Obama Budget proposal, a corporation's distribution of stock of another corporation would reduce the distributing corporation's earnings and profits by the greater of the stock's fair market value or the corporation's basis in the stock. For this purpose, the distributing corporation's basis in the distributed stock would be determined without regard to any adjustments as a result of actual or deemed dividend-equivalent redemptions by S and without regard to any other distributions or transactions undertaken with the view to create and distribute high-basis S stock.

The second of the Obama dividend proposals addresses another avenue through which the earnings and profits of a US corporation may be distributed to its foreign shareholders without being characterised as a dividend. In this case, the cash-rich corporation with earnings and profits funds a second, related corporation that does not have earnings and profits. Funding transactions could include capital contributions, loans, or distributions to the distributing corporation.

Under the proposal, to the extent the funding corporation has funded the other corporation with a principal purpose of avoiding dividend treatment, the amount would be treated as a dividend from the funding corporation.

Jim Fuller (jpfuller@fenwick.com) and David Forst (dforst@fenwick.com)

Fenwick & West

Tel: +1 650 335 7205; +1 650 335 7274

Website: www.fenwick.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Gift this article