US Inbound: Obama Budget proposals: Tax corporate distributions as dividends

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Inbound: Obama Budget proposals: Tax corporate distributions as dividends

fuller.jpg

forst.jpg

Jim Fuller


David Forst

We discussed some of the new Obama Budget proposals last month. The Budget also has a category of proposed changes entitled 'tax corporate distributions as dividends'. These proposals are not targeted solely at international transactions, but can be important internationally. We will discuss two. Unless or until these proposals become law, they may present planning opportunities. One of these proposals focuses on a planning opportunity to permit corporate distributions to be tax-free to the company's shareholders. The plan involves having the corporation distribute stock in a subsidiary or subsidiaries having a high basis but minimal value. The goal is to reduce earnings and profits before making a large distribution to shareholders in the subsequent tax year.

Assume, for example, a foreign-owned US corporation (P) owns all of the common and preferred stock of a US subsidiary (S). P has $1 billion in accumulated earnings and profits. The preferred stock has a value of $10 million, but a basis of $1 billion because of previous dividend-equivalent redemptions in which P received $990 million in cash. Under current law, if an actual or deemed redemption of stock is treated as equivalent to a dividend, the shareholder's basis in any remaining shares of the corporation is increased by the shareholder's basis in the redeemed stock. Thus, the remaining preferred stock has a high basis, even though it has a low value.

If P distributes its $10 million of S preferred stock to its foreign shareholder, P would permanently eliminate any earnings and profits equal to the adjusted basis of the distributed stock ($1 billion). In the following year, P could distribute its accumulated cash of $990 million to its foreign shareholder and avoid dividend characterisation, and any resulting US withholding tax.

Under the Obama Budget proposal, a corporation's distribution of stock of another corporation would reduce the distributing corporation's earnings and profits by the greater of the stock's fair market value or the corporation's basis in the stock. For this purpose, the distributing corporation's basis in the distributed stock would be determined without regard to any adjustments as a result of actual or deemed dividend-equivalent redemptions by S and without regard to any other distributions or transactions undertaken with the view to create and distribute high-basis S stock.

The second of the Obama dividend proposals addresses another avenue through which the earnings and profits of a US corporation may be distributed to its foreign shareholders without being characterised as a dividend. In this case, the cash-rich corporation with earnings and profits funds a second, related corporation that does not have earnings and profits. Funding transactions could include capital contributions, loans, or distributions to the distributing corporation.

Under the proposal, to the extent the funding corporation has funded the other corporation with a principal purpose of avoiding dividend treatment, the amount would be treated as a dividend from the funding corporation.

Jim Fuller (jpfuller@fenwick.com) and David Forst (dforst@fenwick.com)

Fenwick & West

Tel: +1 650 335 7205; +1 650 335 7274

Website: www.fenwick.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Gift this article