China: New Chinese indirect offshore disposal rules issued

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: New Chinese indirect offshore disposal rules issued

ho.jpg

lu.jpg

Khoonming Ho


Lewis Lu

On February 3 2015 the Chinese State Administration of Taxation (SAT) issued Announcement 7 (SAT Announcement [2015] No.7), replacing the PRC's indirect offshore equity disposal reporting and taxation rules in Circular 698, promulgated in 2009, with a substantially new and more comprehensive approach. Announcement 7 will likely have a significant impact on M&A transactions and corporate restructurings undertaken by multinational enterprises involving China enterprises and assets. Announcement 7 expands the scope of indirect transfer transactions potentially subject to corporate income tax (CIT) from the Circular 698 rules and provides that "indirect transfers of assets, including shares of Chinese resident enterprises, by non-resident enterprises, through arrangements without reasonable business purposes which aim to avoid CIT, are to be re-characterised and treated as direct transfers of Chinese taxable property in accordance with CIT Law article 47".

"Chinese taxable property" refers to assets of a Chinese establishment or place of business, immovable property in China and equity investment in PRC resident enterprises, and so on. Any transaction involving a "transfer of equity and other similar interests" in the foreign enterprise which "results in identical or similar transactional outcomes to a direct transfer" is caught. This includes "a restructuring by a non-resident enterprise that results in a change of the foreign enterprise's shareholders". Potentially caught transactions include transfer of partnership interests or convertible debt, and share dilutions.

In assessing how reasonable business purposes are to be determined, Announcement 7 calls for a "comprehensive analysis of real facts and circumstances" and clarifies several specific factors to be considered. It also specifies certain arrangements which can be "automatically" deemed to lack reasonable business purposes. However, on the positive side, Announcement 7 provides safe harbour rules, that is, intra-group reorganisation relief will apply where a commonality of ownership test is met.

For indirect offshore transfers of assets of a Chinese establishment or place of business of a foreign enterprise, the resulting gains are to be included with the annual CIT filing of the Chinese establishment or place of business being transferred and be taxed at the 25% CIT rate on an assessment basis. For Chinese immovable property or equity in a Chinese tax resident enterprise, a withholding tax (WHT) mechanism is applied. The WHT agent is who owes an obligation to make the relevant payments to the share transferor. Compared to Circular 698, Announcement 7 constitutes a significant acceleration in the timing of tax payments.

The transaction reporting arrangements are also significantly altered. Firstly, the tax authorities are empowered to request documentation and information from the transferee, the transferor, the transferred Chinese enterprise and tax advisers. Besides, as Announcement 7 introduces a withholding obligation for the buyer, where neither the WHT agent nor the share transferor has paid tax, the WHT agent/buyer may be relieved from potential penalty by voluntarily submitting specified documentation and information within 30 days of the conclusion of the transfer agreement.

Announcement 7 provides that the in-charge tax authorities must conduct indirect transfer investigations and adjustments in line with the general anti-tax avoidance rules (GAAR). However, the in-charge tax authority will report the case up to the SAT within 30 days after the tax is paid.

Announcement 7 is effective from the date of issuance and will apply to transfers occurring before the issuance, in respect of which no Circular 698 tax filing or processing procedures have yet been conducted.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel. +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel. +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
The US president has raised India’s tariff rate to 50% because of its importation of Russian oil; in other news, firms made key international tax partner hires
Tax auditors themselves had not been aware of the new TP ‘transaction matrix’ requirements, ITR hears as five German partners share their client experiences
Gift this article