Germany: Deduction of foreign partner’s interest expense

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Deduction of foreign partner’s interest expense

schanzle.jpg

birker.jpg

Dr Thomas Schänzle


Christian Birker

On September 26 2014, the Finance Ministry revised its comprehensive circular on the treatment of partnerships under the tax treaties. Of particular interest are its remarks on partners' interest costs incurred in connection with their partnership holdings. The fundamental principle behind the German computation of partnership income is that all income flowing to a partner is deemed to be part of that partner's profit share and thus does not reduce the partnership's profit as a business expense (loan interest, service fees and so on) and that all expenses incurred by a partner in respect of his investment or activities in the partnership are deductible from his share of the partnership income. This principle is reaffirmed by a treaty override provision in the Income Tax Act which applies unless the treaty explicitly states otherwise.

The revised circular now seems to be casting doubt on the continued application of the general principle, in particular in respect of loan interest incurred by a foreign partner. It states that such interest may only be deducted from the German source partnership income if it is effectively connected with that income. It then mentions the financing cost of an interest-free loan to the partnership as an example of a lack of the necessary connection. However, it is silent as to whether the same applies in cases where the partner's equity is refinanced.

Deduction of a partner's financing costs for the acquisition of a partnership share is a fundamental building block of many inbound partnership structures. Although it is and continues to be based on German partnership taxation principles, recourse to the courts may now be necessary.

Dr Thomas Schänzle (thomas.schaenzle@de.pwc.com) and Christian Birker (christian.birker@de.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +49 69 9585 6477 and +49 69 9585 6061

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article