Ireland: Tax treatment of exchange traded funds

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ireland: Tax treatment of exchange traded funds

thornton.jpg

tully.jpg

Gerry Thornton


Philip Tully

The Irish Revenue Commissioners recently published a guidance note to clarify their position on the tax treatment of Irish investors investing in exchange traded funds (ETFs) domiciled outside Ireland. In Table 1, we have summarised the relevant tax treatment that Revenue will apply. To give the full picture, we have also included the treatment of Irish domiciled ETFs. The Revenue guidance is solely focused on the tax treatment of investors that are Irish tax resident. The guidance is not relevant to non-Irish investors who hold units in Irish ETFs. The Irish tax treatment in respect of such non-Irish investors is clear; such investors are wholly exempt from Irish tax on their returns from Irish ETFs.

Table 1

Domicile of ETF

Tax treatment

1. Ireland

No exit tax. Irish resident individuals are subject to income tax at a special rate of 41% on all returns (dividends and gains) on a self-assessment basis. No social insurance (PRSI) or universal social charge (USC). Any losses are ring-fenced and are not available for offset.

2. EU – UCITS

Taxed in the same way as Irish ETFs (see above). Therefore, Irish resident individuals are subject to income tax at a special rate of 41% on all returns (dividends and gains) on a self-assessment basis. No PRSI or USC. Any losses are ring-fenced and are not available for offset. This position has always been clear and follows specific legislative provisions.

3. EU – Non-UCITS

In most cases, taxed in the same way as Irish ETFs (that is, 41% tax, no charge to PRSI or USC and losses ring-fenced). However, Revenue acknowledge that it is possible that some EU ETFs which are not UCITS may, because of their legal set-up, fall outside the 41% income tax regime and may instead be subject to normal capital gains tax (33%) and income tax rules (as described below). Revenue are willing to consider submissions on a case-by-case basis in this regard and acknowledge that taxpayers may decide to take such a position in appropriate cases.

4. Non-EU OECD (eg, US)

Generally, subject to normal capital gains tax and income tax rules. Therefore, marginal rate income tax (up to 40%), plus USC (up to 11%) and PRSI (4%), as applicable, on dividends received by Irish resident individuals and 33% capital gains on capital gains arising on the disposal of shares. Capital losses may generally be used to offset gains. Therefore, dividends will generally be taxed at a higher rate than European ETFs (1-3 above) but gains will generally be taxed at a lower rate.

5. Non-OECD (eg, Singapore)

Subject to a different tax treatment again. Both income and gains will generally be taxed at marginal income tax rate (up to 40%), plus USC (up to 11%) and PRSI (4%), as applicable.


Gerry Thornton
(gerry.thornton@matheson.com) and Philip Tully (philip.tully@matheson.com)

Matheson

Tel: + 353 1 232 2000

Website: www.matheson.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Gift this article