Swiss Parliament ends intra-group dividend distributions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Swiss Parliament ends intra-group dividend distributions

intl-updates-small.jpg

Taxpayers will no longer face a 5% late payment interest on withholding tax payments that miss the 30-day filing deadline under new rules agreed upon by lawmakers.

stocker.jpg
kistler.jpg

Raoul Stocker

Jacques Kistler

By way of background, a Swiss corporation can fulfil its withholding tax liability by using a notification procedure to the Swiss Federal Tax Administration instead of remitting withholding tax. For intra-group dividends, the dividend notification procedure can be applied if the recipient of the dividend is a corporation and holds a qualifying participation in the Swiss corporation paying the dividends.

In 2011, the Swiss Supreme Court ruled that missing the 30-day filing deadline resulted in a forfeiture of the right to apply the notification procedure for qualifying intra-group dividends. Based on this decision the Swiss Federal Tax Administration levied a 5% late payment interest on the withholding tax liability if it was paid 30 days after the dividend due date) in cases where the deadline for the notification procedure was missed.

On September 30 2016, the Swiss Parliament agreed to amend the Swiss withholding tax law as follows:

  • If the respective requirements are met, the notification procedure for withholding tax on intra-group dividend distributions will apply, even if the 30-day filing deadline is missed;

  • The amended law applies retroactively, unless the statute of limitations on the tax liability/late payment interest has expired, or the tax liability/late payment interest were already finally assessed prior to January 1 2011;

  • Taxpayers who had to pay late payment interest for missing the 30-day deadline for the notification procedure can retroactively claim back the late payment interest if the respective requirements are met;

  • After the enactment of the new law, the taxpayer will have to make an official request to claim back the late payment interest within one year; and

  • Missing the 30-day filing deadline will in the future only lead to an administrative fine of up to CHF 5,000 ($5,000).

The law change will be subject to a possible referendum, which may be considered relatively unlikely, so that the new law could enter into force in early 2017.

The amended withholding tax law represents the best possible outcome for taxpayers because the law applies retroactively and allows late payment interest paid by taxpayers to be reclaimed.

While missing the 30-day deadline will no longer lead to a forfeiture of the notification procedure and there will no longer be 5% late payment interest, it is still important for taxpayers to meet the 30-day filing deadline for the notification procedure, so they comply with the law and to avoid possible fines.

Raoul Stocker (rstocker@deloitte.ch) and Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte Switzerland

Tel: +41 58 279 6271 and +41 58 279 8164

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article